SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (256464)5/18/2002 10:52:02 AM
From: rich4eagle  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
Michael, I try to refrain from making you foolish and childish, but you get so arrogant sometimes I just have to to give you a lesson in humility which is lacking in your overestimation of yourself so here goes.

What is a CP 901, MAD, ALR-67, UYS-1, an AYK-14, if you cannot answer, you are a fraud! How many sensor stations on an EP-3E. How many seats in a P-3, how many heads, what is the typical on station time, where are they based. BTW, I thought the discussion was about surveillance not ASW, do you know the difference, fraud! BTW, OPORD, is an Operational Reqts Document and ASW stands for Anti-submarine Warfare, and if you drop sonobuoys into the water you can probably make it act like a submarine as well as detect them, none of which has anything to with the discussion about EP-3E's and their mission or whether they ever fly inside international waters. FLEETEX and JTFEX likely is an acronym for Fleet exercise and Joint task force exercise, and so on.

So genius, you still have not answered my question and if you cannot answer those simple questions about P-3 operations above, not answering is tantamount to being a fraud, are you a fraud.

BTW, answer this question if you cannot you are an absolute fraud, what does OFP, SSA, ISA and NTDS stand for.

If you would like to say "hey Rich you really do know about this stuff and I respect your opinion and apologize for attacking your credibility", I will accept a humble apology. Otherwise be your arrogant fraudulent self.



To: greenspirit who wrote (256464)5/18/2002 11:20:29 AM
From: rich4eagle  Respond to of 769670
 
What are you doing Mike frantically scurrying around researching ways to make me look fraudulent, never will happen Mike, you should apologize Mr. Arrogant.