SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: S. maltophilia who wrote (9870)5/18/2002 10:49:32 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Pure Crap, Galacticomm Technologies IPO'd starting at $6 and falling to $4.75. Security Capital could not hype thae crap and saw the writing on the Wall. After 4 days of trading it was in the low 4's. Still knowbody was buying the Galaticomm story. Security Capital which is famous for pure crap knew they could face huge loses because they had to support the crap from $6 to the low fors thus eating crap. They figured the only way to get out of their loses was to recind them thus pulling the crappy ipo from the market and thus canceling their loses.

Security Capital even tried putting the crappy ipo into customer accounts without their knowledge. Known as "Parking Stock" a common Boiler Room crappy highly illegal practice once the stock was unparked Security Capital would to have also eaten those crappy loses. Buy recinding the IPO those loses also disappeared.

"One Securities Capital broker, Timothy Ryan, violated NASD and federal rules by placing buy orders as part of the IPO for customers who had not authorized them, the NASD said. Security Capital now operates under the name Vertical Capital Partners, Inc., the NASD said."

NASD charges underwriter of unjustly ditching IPO
By Reuters
Aug 16 2001 10:40 AM PDT
WASHINGTON, Aug 16 (Reuters) - Regulators Thursday charged Security Capital Trading, Inc., an independent New York brokerage, with unjustly terminating the $11 million initial public offering of Galacticomm Technologies Inc. after its shares had been trading for four days.
Security Capital, which was charged along with its President Ronald Heineman, "unilaterally and without justification, terminated the IPO," according to the National Association of Securities Dealers' regulatory arm.

Security Capital and Heineman's attorney could not be immediately reached for comment.

Initial public offerings are the first sale of shares by a company to the investing public. Brokerages and investment banks get a fee for arranging the sale and it is extremely rare for an IPO to be terminated after it is completed, which results in canceled trades.

The lost proceeds from the IPO, which took place on Sept. 23, 1998, in part led to Galacticomm going out of business, the NASD said. Galacticomm shares were trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, the agency said.

More than 500 investors, several brokerage firms and stock- trade clearing agents also were adversely affected when trades placed over the four days had to be canceled, the NASD said.

One Securities Capital broker, Timothy Ryan, violated NASD and federal rules by placing buy orders as part of the IPO for customers who had not authorized them, the NASD said. Security Capital now operates under the name Vertical Capital Partners, Inc., the NASD said.



To: S. maltophilia who wrote (9870)5/18/2002 10:54:30 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
CRD# 1245453 TIMOTHY JOHN RYAN

PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT

This section provides 10 years of an individual's employment history. If the individual is currently registered with the NASD, employment history will be displayed for the previous 10 years. If the individual is not currently registered with the NASD, employment history will be displayed for the 10 years prior to termination of the registration. For employers that are or were an NASD member firm, the firm's CRD number, the location of the office where the broker was employed, and the dates of employment will be displayed.


Employing Firm: VANGUARD CAPITAL
Firm CRD Number: 22081
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 10/2001
End Date: 03/2002

Employing Firm: AUERBACH, POLLAK & RICHARDSON INC.
Firm CRD Number: 29824
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 01/2001
End Date: 10/2001

Employing Firm: DIRKS & COMPANY, INC.
Firm CRD Number: 42185
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 01/1999
End Date: 12/2000

Employing Firm: SECURITY CAPITAL TRADING, INC.
Firm CRD Number: 35909
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 12/1997
End Date: 03/1999

Employing Firm: ROAN CAPITAL PARTNERS L.P.
Firm CRD Number: 33063
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 02/1996
End Date: 11/1997

Employing Firm: WHALE SECURITIES CO., L.P.
Firm CRD Number: 13516
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 12/1994
End Date: 02/1996

Employing Firm: BISHOP, ROSEN & CO., INC.
Firm CRD Number: 1248
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 09/1994
End Date: 12/1994

Employing Firm: D. BLECH & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Firm CRD Number: 26063
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 01/1994
End Date: 09/1994

Employing Firm: T.R. WINSTON & COMPANY, INC.
Firm CRD Number: 10571
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 08/1993
End Date: 01/1994

Employing Firm: HAMPSHIRE SECURITIES CORPORATION
Firm CRD Number: 19725
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 10/1992
End Date: 08/1993

Employing Firm: D. BLECH & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Firm CRD Number: 26063
Office of Employment
Address: NEW YORK, NY
Start Date: 11/1991
End Date: 10/1992



To: S. maltophilia who wrote (9870)5/18/2002 12:11:20 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Dirks Galacticomm stock parking piker->NASD Registered Person: TIMOTHY JOHN RYAN
CRD Number: 1245453


******** REGULATORY ACTION (1 of 1) ********


Reporting Source: Regulator (Form U-6)

Date Reported: 07/26/2001

Initiated By: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC.

Date initiated: 07/23/2001

Docket/
Case Number: CAF010013

Employing Firm: SECURITY CAPITAL TRADING, INC.

Allegations: 07-26-01, SECTION 10(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
SEC RULE 10B-5, NASD RULES 2110 AND 2120 - RESPONDENT OPENED
ACCOUNTS AND ENTERED PURCHASE ORDERS FOR IPO SHARES AND
WARRANTS FOR PUBLIC CUSTOMERS WITHOUT THEIR AUTHORIZATION AND,
IN SPITE OF SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE CUSTOMERS, WAS DONE
WITH AN INTENT TO DECEIVE THEM OR WITH A RECKLESS DISREGARD OF
THEIR INTERESTS AND INTENTIONS.

Current Status: Pending

Summary:



NASDR Public Disclosure Program May 18, 2002 Page 5
This information is current as of: 05/17/2002
________________________________________________________________________________
NASD Registered Person: TIMOTHY JOHN RYAN
CRD Number: 1245453

REGULATORY ACTIONS(cont.)

***********************************
Reporting Source: Broker (Form U-4)

Date Reported: 10/23/2001

Initiated By: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC.

Date initiated: 07/23/2001

Docket/
Case Number: CAF010013

Employing Firm: SECURITY CAPITAL TRADING, INC.

Allegations: 07/26/2001 RESPONDENT OPENED ACCOUNTS AND ENTERED PURCHASE
ORDERS FOR IPO SHARES AND WARRANTS FOR PUBLIC CUSTOMERS
WITHOUT THEIR AUTHORIZATION AND, INSPITE OF SPECIFIC
INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE CUSTOMERS, WAS DONE WITH AN INTENT TO
DECEIVE THEM OR WITH A RECKLESS DISREGARD OF THEIR INTEREST
AND INTENTIONS.

Current Status: Pending

Summary:


NASDR Public Disclosure Program May 18, 2002 Page 6
This information is current as of: 05/17/2002
________________________________________________________________________________
NASD Registered Person: TIMOTHY JOHN RYAN
CRD Number: 1245453

********************************************************************************
CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS


** OCCURRENCE COUNTS ** 1 Record(s)

********************************************************************************


******** CUSTOMER COMPLAINT (1 of 1) ********


Reporting Source: Firm (Form U-5)

Date Reported: 12/20/2000

Date Received: 09/11/2000

Employing Firm: DIRKS & CO. INC.

Allegations: MR. VASELENIUCK PURCHASED 3126 SHS. OF TRUE VISION INTL. FOR
$50,000 & ADVISED THAT THE $ WOULD BE RETURNED WITH 14%
INTEREST. ONLY 12,000 WAS RETURNED,LEAVING $38,000 PLUS
INTEREST TO BE RETURNED. RYAN ALONG WITH DAVIS THOMPKINS AND
THE CO. BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE BY VASELENIUCK.

Alleged Damages: $38,000.00

Action Pending?: Yes

Disposition
Details:


***********************************
Reporting Source: Broker (Form U-4)

Date Reported: 03/22/2001

Date Received: 09/11/2000

Employing Firm: DIRKS & CO

Allegations: MR. VASELENIUK MADE AN INVESTMENT IN TRUEVISION INTERNATIONAL
INC. HIS NOTE WAS PAST DUE. MR. VASELENIUK COMPLAINED TO
TRUEVISION AND ALSO NAMED DIRKS & CO WHERE I WAS EMPLOYED
BECAUSE DIRKS WAS SUPPOSED TO TAKE TRUEVISION PUBLIC.

Alleged Damages: $38,000.00

Action Pending?: Yes

Disposition
Details:



To: S. maltophilia who wrote (9870)5/18/2002 5:28:36 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
The central bank head also said that six accounts had been frozen because they may have breached the law. He noted that five of the six cases involved “boiler room” operations involving Filipinos and foreigners.

“Boiler-room” operations involve the selling of phony stocks to overseas customers with Australia and New Zealand frequently being the targets.

Finance - Philippines alters Money-laundering Laws - BizAsia.com

Finance 16.Mar.02 00:32 GMT+7
Philippines alters Money-laundering Laws

Seeking to get off the “non-cooperative” list of countries, the Philippines has revised a major anti-money laundering law
BizAsia, by ds - A key anti-money laundering law has been revised in the Philippines in order for it to be hopefully removed from the dreaded list of “non-cooperative” countries.

Central bank governor Raefael Buenaventura speaking at a signing ceremony said the country had adequately addressed and clarified concerns put to it by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

The FATF is an independent branch of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

The new revisions follow a last-minute attempt by the Philippines to get off the list one day before the September 30 FATF deadline for imposing sanctions.

The Paris-based organization decided to keep the Philippines on its list after it raised contentious provisions in the hastily passed law.

The deficiencies in the law as cited by the FATF included the threshold for reporting possible irregularities was four million pesos
($78,740) and the limited authority of the central bank to determine the owners of non-checking numbered accounts was also cited.

Buenaventura said the new rules instructs banks to report any suspicious transactions, regardless of the amount involved as long as there is reasonable belief it involved money-laundering activity.

The central bank head also said that six accounts had been frozen because they may have breached the law. He noted that five of the six cases involved “boiler room” operations involving Filipinos and foreigners.

“Boiler-room” operations involve the selling of phony stocks to overseas customers with Australia and New Zealand frequently being the targets.

Many Philippine legislators are not certain that the country will be taken off the list by December as the FATF’s evaluation is long and painstaking.



To: S. maltophilia who wrote (9870)5/18/2002 6:24:27 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Rebel With a Cause - Attorney Uses New Issues to Get Rich Quick
The Washington Post - Business - 09.06.81
By John F. Berryin

The Burger court said in 1977...that if you fully disclose to people in a stock prospectus that you're cheating them, then you're not defrauding them. So if you tell them in the stock offering, "This is utterly worthless," and they buy it, then there's no violation of law. ~Howard B. Sirota, Wall Street Attorney

When John Muir & Co. collapsed last month, it seemed to spell the beginning of the end of another Wall Street craze.

For nearly two years, investors have been gobbling up shares of stock in unknown companies, many with negligible assets but high hopes. Muir, under the direction of its general partner, superpromoter Raymond L. Dirks, had led the field underwriting these new issues, pumping out an amazing 43 in just 18 months.

As if underline the risk of investing in the new-issues market, Muir was driven into liquidation at least partly because investors alleged that claims made in offering prospectuses were fraudulent. A spate of class-action lawsuits, along with a massive Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, was apparently more than Muir could stand.

Dirks was one of the first to realize that investors were ready to gamble on new issues, but the word soon got out, and a wide array of deal makers flocked to the Street to capitalize on the trend. And while some of the little companies taken public by these promoters were seeking funds to finance legitimate business expansion, many more have been corporations in name only, devised to sell stock that would enrich the brokers and the promoters.

At least that's the contention of one unusually candid Wall Street attorney, who is himself a prime example of how a small circle of insiders gets rich on new issues - often at the expense of the investing public.

Howard B. Sirota is 32 years old, out of law school about three years, in his own Wall Street practice less than two years. He made "more than a hundred thou" the first year and expects to make "probably twice as much" this year.

Not bad for a former organizer of the Students for a Democratic Society, who less than a decade ago wanted to overthrow the very capitalism he now enjoys.

Sirota learned to appreciate finance from his stepfather, a bookie who Sirota says went off to the track one day and never came back. He began reading stock prospectuses in high school and continued the practice sub rosa during his anticapitalist, SDS phase. Before going to law school, he earned a living as a "hired gun," using his financial expertise to dig dirt on corporations for law firms and brokerage houses.

His Afro hairstyle, which once stretched form here to there, has been shorn, tattered blue jeans have given way to finely tailored Brooks Brothers suits, and meals of bean sprouts and brown rice have long since been replaced by perfectly prepared steaks at his favorite East Side restaurant, the famous and expensive Christ Cella.

In terms of money, Sirota is a tremendous success. His cab fare home at night from Wall Street to Flatbush, he says a bit uncomfortably, is more than his father made in a day working as a presser in the garment district.

But Sirota, for all of his new trappings of success, has not totally abandoned his rebellious ways. While other young attorneys in big firms walk cautiously along the gray-flannel road toward a partnership, Sirota is a loner, openly disdainful of the system that is making his fortune possible.

The story of Sirota's overnight rise to riches on the Street, told in his own unvarnished, Brooklyn accented words, is enough to make a cautious investor nervous about the stock market.

Sirota makes his money giving legal advice to clients who want to "take public" little, capital hungry businesses - that is, raise money by selling stock to the public. If investors ever bothered to read the prospectuses prepared by Sirota for some of his clients, they would find that in some cases the companies don't have any actual products - only promises of products. But as any stockbroker knows, it's a rare investor who reads an offering statement.

"Ultimately," says Sirota, "I'd like to put a legend up on these things, 'Warning, persons considering an investment in these securities should see a psychiatrist.' But people would still buy it."

"The hottest new issues usually are in companies that claim to be involved in some trendy product," Sirota says. His clients, for example, have started up companies in such Wall Street pop items as solar energy and gene-splicing, cancer cures and oil and gas tax shelters.

Sirota reviews the securities offerings to be sure they meet the requirement of law before they are submitted to the SEC, the Federal agency that oversees the securities markets. Once the securities registration statements clear the SEC - a modest hurdle, Sirota says - then his clients are free to sell the stocks or bonds to the public. If his clients follow his advice, they can unload the stock at a quick profit and still stay within the letter of the law.

As it happens, Sirota started his practice on the eve of the biggest new issues craze since the early 1970s. According to the publication "Going Public," in the first six months of this year 259 companies sold new issues of common stock and raised nearly $2 billion, up from 237 companies raising $1.4 billion in 1980, and 81 raising $506 million in 1979.

While allowing that the new issues market has been staggered by the Muir collapse, Sirota believes that it still has some life left. "The new-issues market attracts the least knowledgeable investors. These people have to be killed before they give up and get out of the market," he claims.

Reaching into his desk drawer, Sirota pulls out a stock prospectus for one of his clients, a solar energy company. (It was agreed that none of Sirota's clients would be named in this article.)

The prospectus didn't reveal precisely what the company manufactured, so he is asked: "Is there any product?"

"Are you crazy?" Sirota replies in mock amazement. "These guys have a fantastic product. It converts sunlight directly into money for the investors and promoters. And it's fully reversible. It converts the investors' money into sunlight. It's a remarkable chemical achievement."

But surely such chicanery violates the securities laws.

"Thanks to Richard Nixon's Supreme Court , it's completely kosher," says the former student activist with undisguised glee.

For example, Sirota reads the "risk factors" listed in the prospectus of the solar company, the very same "Sante Fe" disclosures that save him and his clients from being accused of violating the antifraud statutes of the federal securities laws. If investors read it, they would learn the following about the company: "No record of sales or earnings...no manufacturing facility...possible infringement of a patent...inadequate funds...management salaries to be paid from proceeds of stock sale...no orders or contracts for products...."

Another Sirota client sold interests in an oil-drilling venture. Says Sirota: "This guy acts as the general partner, the promoter, the underwriter, the explorer, the finder, the contractor. And if you imagine a circular conference table, he jumps from seat to seat, negotiating with himself, paying himself exorbitant fees for his services. So when he's done, maybe the only way he'd find oil would be to drill in a gas station and hit a tank. But if he does hit oil, he gets half the profits. It's all perfectly legal. And that's how he can afford to take his lawyer to lunch at Lutece."

How do these deals come about?

"Promoters...have brainstorming sessions where they chew over trends," Says Sirota. "Some will just do oil deals until there is no more energy crisis. But the more imaginative ones decide the real money is to be made in something new - say gene-splicing. They come to me and ask if I've done a gene-splicing deal. And I say, 'No, but I'm sure you would be covered if we include the usual laundry list of warnings to the investor that it's an utterly worthless offering and that they'll lose all their money if they invest.'"

"Then," continues Sirota, "the promoter goes out and hires some guy, preferably with a Ph.D. in molecular biology from MIT who is more interested in making money than getting a Nobel Prize. They make him president, give him assistants, fill a lab with glass beakers and microscopes and, insto-presto, you have something called New Life Biology Corp. Inc. The professor is given 1 million shares of stock, and told it would be taken public at a dollar a share. And if it works, and the stock can be kept up long enough, the professor is told he can sell his shares and make a fortune."

Sirota estimates that there are "at least $100 million in worthless new issues" sold to the public each year, but he adds, "If you told me that it was five times that, well, I wouldn't argue with you. The fact is, nobody knows."

The vast majority of new stock issues is sold on the huge, unwieldy over-the-counter market. When Sirota graduated from Brooklyn Law School in 1978, he went to work in the enforcement division of the Washington-based National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), the self policing arm of the over-the-counter market.

"Self-regulation means never having to say you're sorry," says Sirota.

After 18 months, Sirota passed through the NASD's revolving door to Wall Street. He solved the problem of being unknown by simply sending out announcements to all those stock manipulators he had been chasing while he was at the NASD.

"Boom city from the beginning," is how Sirota describes what happened next as his one-time investigative targets became his valued clients. "One guy said to me, 'You kicked my ass but you were a gentleman,'" says Sirota with a laugh. "Another said, 'You're tenacious, tough, and smart, and I want to sic you on someone I don't like.'"

As for the future, when the new issues craze inevitably passes, Sirota claims he will switch sides and become a plaintiffs' lawyer, representing aggrieved stockholders in suits against corporations. That's the kind of law he went to law school to practice, he says. But he needed a bankroll to finance the normally prolonged court battles against powerful corporate legal staffs. His piece of the new-issues action will help, he says.

Back to Publicity


Home | Recent Shenanigans | Daily News | Recent Securities | Securities Law Offerings
About Sirota & Sirota | Useful Contacts | Required Reading | Free Newsletter
Copyright © 2001-2002 Sirota & Sirota LLP. All Rights Reserved