SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul V. who wrote (63924)5/21/2002 4:36:43 AM
From: StanX Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Chartered Semi raises revenue forecast
By Jennifer Tan
Tuesday May 21, 12:48 PM

sg.news.yahoo.com

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing, the world's No. 3 contract chip maker, has raised its revenue estimate and cut its second-quarter loss forecast as the industry rebound gathers steam.

Singapore-based Chartered now expects revenue to rise by about 40 percent from the first quarter's US$84.4 million, compared with previous guidance of a 25 percent increase, thanks to stronger orders in the communications and computer markets.

Including Chartered's share of Fab 5 (Silicon Manufacturing Partners), revenue for the three months to June 30 is expected to rise by 45 percent versus earlier guidance of 30 percent.

"The acceleration in orders, which we began to see in late March, has continued into the quarter," chief financial officer Chia Song Hwee said in a statement released after the New York market close on Monday.

"Having set a target in April to more than double Chartered's revenues between the first and fourth quarter of this year, this added momentum is very encouraging."

The company's loss per American Depositary Share (ADS) is expected to be about 76 U.S. cents to 77 cents for this quarter, compared with prior guidance of a loss of 82 cents to 84 cents.

Its net loss is now forecast at about $105 million to $107 million, down from $113 million to $116 million earlier.



To: Paul V. who wrote (63924)5/21/2002 5:18:52 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
OT re: biogenetic technology and nanotechnology

I recently started buying BBH and IBB, the biotech index trackers. I consider these to be LT holdings. Biotech, IMO, is finally growing up, becoming a real industry, with real products, real sales, and real profits. Amgen, with recent acquisition, is now in the same class as the BigPharm companies. The old, established drug companies, more and more, are finding that the only way to have a pipeline, is to buy it from a biotech company, either through partnering or outright purchase.

This is one of those Transforming Technologies, more important than semiconductors or electricity or railroads. Now, when the sector is out of favor, and stocks in general are out of favor, now is the time to be buying these stocks. I use the Exchange Traded Finds, to avoid the event risk inherent in buying individual stocks.

The basic technology of biotech, is going to serially take over many Old Economy sectors: first pharm, then agriculture (unless the Luddites win the propaganda war), then the energy and chemicals industries, then construction and general manufacturing. If you want to build anything, or change any molecule into another molecule, there is probably a living organism who already knows how to do it, in a process refined by 3B years of evolution, and do it far more efficiently and precisely, than any other conceivable method. Also, the machinery is self-repairing, and self-replicating. Once we learn to harness these processes, it will Change Everything.

In addition, this technology is unlikely to become a commodity. Everything is being patented, the products and processes.

Caveats:
1. nanotechnology is still BlueSkyStuff, about where biotech was 20 years ago.
2. biotech has gone through two Bubbles in its brief history (1991 and 2000). When they are in favor, stock prices become absurd. Those times are selling opportunities. The 1999-2000 Bubble may not have fully deflated yet.
3. it is so expensive to develop a process, or a product, that most companies (even big ones) depend for all their profits on 1-3 products. Most biotech companies aren't making profits yet, and most of them are not complete companies, lacking marketing/sales, lacking the ability to jump through the FDA hoops, lacking financing, lacking other essential skills. So there is huge "event risk" in this sector. Even after a product is on the market, and is a big success, the risk isn't over. In the last few years, many products have been withdrawn from the market, for safety issues that weren't discovered until millions of patients had used them. So, at any time, any blockbuster drug can change into a huge unmeasurable liability.
4. This is a heavily regulated industry, far more than the semi industry is. So all these companies are at the mercy of bureaucrats with half the I.Q. of the people running biotech companies. As always, they do a lot of random stupid things that add a lot of expenses to the final products.