Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Corner Bay Silver (BAY.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (4067)	5/21/2002 10:28:34 AM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4409

You know {and I could be wrong, but doubt it}; But I always thought that you didn't go back to drilling on a property during a feasibility study UNTIL the study comes back inconclusive or proof positive. Reason is that it's either a waste of money to due so, or it's a waste of money unless you know where to back up proof of reserves. Either way it goes counter to logical expenditures. This action between PAAS and Bay seem counter to logical merger as BAY is acting while a study is out. THERE is no positive reason to merge FOR BAY under this circumstance. Since if a positive feasibility comes out, then BAY has effectively lowered their capital worth. BUT if such results of the study are negative, then PAAS would be the looser. This merger smells in my opinion, but hey. All I would like to say now is... GO BAY GO. I wish all the shareholders the best of wishes... Me I think I'll buy a lottery ticket, call it an investment.

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (4067)	5/21/2002 10:29:15 AM
From: robnhood	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4409

How can you show your face around here? Once again as in BRE.X you were dead wrong.....

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (4067)	5/21/2002 11:42:24 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4409

<There is a derogatory term for this type of insider incest...and all publically posted right here, under the watchful eye of the regulators...> Dear G_T, You have been an a****e since you started to post on this thread. And you continue to be one. Instead of admitting that you have been wrong and lacked the knowledge to properly evaluate this mining situation, you prefer to keep on accusing people. Your choice. But you can be sure that all SI members now understand who you really are.

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (4067)	5/22/2002 3:07:43 AM
From: TheBusDriver	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4409

Hey Gold thing my silence is do to a holiday w/o a laptop, something your pea brain might not comprehend. You were dead wrong and CC was spot on!! ;o HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA or is it YEEEEEEHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAA???? either way you're stuffed. Both feet in that big mouth. Silver is nearly breaking out as well, if it does break out you will be wrong there too. Kinda puts things in perspective about you for all the people who have had to read your dribble for the last year, doesn't it? Wrong, wrong again and guess what WRONG AGAIN!!! What dummie would listen to you now? Anyway I come back to a take over and BAY was $6.75 when I checked. Congrats CC. Who would have thought this day would come back when we were buying BAY at .50c???<grin> All BAY shareholders have EARNED to the right to crow a little, especially if they were FGX holders as well. I remember what FGX did, so I have a spread of sell orders in at much higher prices. Now lowering BAY to 15% of my PF and will hold in case silver does finally break out. Today might be the day! Good luck with your investments there GT, if you really have any. Wayne