SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (70371)5/22/2002 2:04:18 PM
From: ItsAllCyclical  Respond to of 99280
 
>> and dollar weakness (the real culprit, IMTO). <<

Actually I would list NEM buying Normandy and reversing it's hedging policy forcing ABX to follow suit as the real culprit.

You could say that gold started to rise in anticipation of a falling dollar, but if you go back and look at the charts the sector really lit up when NEM made it's purchase.

The falling dollar will definately help sustain the gold rise, but gold would have rallied regardless, albiet more slowly. JMHO.

There are more reasons to hold gold here than just the falling dollar. Look at gold charts internationally over the last 2 years. The US market was the last to rally. The gold rally is a world-wide phenomenon.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (70371)5/22/2002 2:09:13 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Zeev:

But did you buy any gold stocks or funds? I get the impression you are strongly biased against gold as an investment. You seem to be part of the "barbarous relic" crowd.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (70371)5/22/2002 2:47:41 PM
From: Stockdoctor  Respond to of 99280
 
i am thinking we get a bounce at 1600.....looks like the bounce from 1650 to 1676 was it....very anemic bounces indeed.