SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (80512)5/22/2002 10:44:46 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Elmer, I haven't put much credence in the PC Worldmark benchmark. According to Petz:

"I guess PC World was too sheepish to compare Intel-based systems to AMD-based systems and admit that even a 1 GHz Duron system like the Polywell 1000DU scored a 93, and the el-cheapo Emachines T1400 XP1600+ scored 89."

Pretty interesting that a 1GHz Duron outperforms a 1.4GHz Athlon XP, isn't it? My guess is that the benchmark (which has never favored the Pentium 4 - Northwood included) is more I/O based, so the hard drive could be a big factor. Other things, like integrated video, and slower memory timings could play a big part, too. Remember, these are end-user systems being tested here, not processors. That's why I think it's bogus to give the Celeron 1.7GHz a "thumbs down". What they are really doing is giving the Gateway 300S a "thumbs down".

wbmw



To: Elmer who wrote (80512)5/23/2002 1:43:05 PM
From: Jim McMannisRespond to of 275872
 
RE:"The only explanation that makes sense is that Intel wants to play the MHz card while utilizing their remaining .18u capacity. A cheaper though higher performing Tualatin/Celeron doesn't market as well as a higher frequency P4 version."

MHz Sells (tm)

Jim