Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (167683)	5/22/2002 11:19:19 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Respond to of 436258

dear die ree: ho ho ho. like they have a choice now. so, its the go slow story, just like good wheel. these guys never give up. that's why shareholders love them. 666 (there is a pact, and it is a contract that cannot be broken when the day of reckoning comes.) ur frend. tl&ev

To: Les H who wrote (167683)	5/22/2002 11:32:11 PM
From: Les H	Respond to of 436258

the danger of derivatives atimes.com

To: Les H who wrote (167683)	5/22/2002 11:51:31 PM
From: 10K a day	Respond to of 436258

well why not...if they sell puts as revenue....makes' perfect sense to me..

To: Les H who wrote (167683)	5/23/2002 6:20:08 AM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Les: You have to love his comments...... My oh my,..... if you force us to expense our "hidden" (from non-literate shareholders, that is) method for compensating our employees, it would reduce our (reported) profitability and we would have to "reduce the program". What he might also have added is that having to expense option costs would also cut the stock price dramatically and force the company to pay higher wages to hold on to its employees. You also have to give him credit fore fighting an excellent rear guard action. Better to lose part of this lucrative scam than all of it. Best, Earlie