SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Flag Resources (FGR.A A) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hank2010 who wrote (3752)5/23/2002 9:46:13 AM
From: ali  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4269
 
Hank, what is your hang up with flag and your definition of reserves? I notice that you are very critical of Murdo and his actions or inaction, but don't say very much about the land(exploration rights) holdings of flag - its only value.
I also did not see any of your criticism of the man who is the main shareholder of this co. and could dispose of him at a moments notice, why?
Whithout any (of my)doubt,Flag has established a most remarkable land position in the Sudbury mining camp, not withstanding the criticisms and foul attacks of people like you.If you are a real interested share holder of flag you would do your part for the betterment of the company instead of trying to cut the flow of exploration funds to prove up 'reserves'by ridiculing its president the way you do with innuendos and false accusations.I do not always agree with what Mr. Macleod does either,but then I have not enough detail knowledge of running an exploration either to accuse him of mismanagement ,but DO have the conviction that he does his best for the company and is honest about it.
With the list of priorities which were presented in the last
NR I am certain that there will be great interest
for 'outside' money to come in and help to count the ounces of gold so they could be called 'reserves' in your terms.
As for me, gold or no gold,I'd rather see some realization of the Schandle report.