Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TREND1 who wrote (70997)	5/24/2002 5:54:37 AM
From: Jim Cash	Respond to of 99280

5.) or he'll simply keep raising the top until it holds and include this run as his prediction of a pre Nasdaq meltdown rally..

To: TREND1 who wrote (70997)	5/24/2002 11:09:54 AM
From: Paul Shread	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 99280

San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank says 876 is fair value on the S&P frbsf.org

To: TREND1 who wrote (70997)	5/24/2002 6:29:43 PM
From: MechanicalMethod	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Larry, It's my opinion those settings are too loose but I don't have a better suggestion because it's the nature of P&F charts. There's P&F qualities I like but rounding price to box sizes sacrifices the sharp edge of reversal zones. Of course it's strength is that direction is always clear. How can I keep direction clear while maintaining the sharp edges? MM

To: TREND1 who wrote (70997)	5/24/2002 8:58:41 PM
From: Jdaasoc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Now look at this chart. (1)30 pts (.3% away from a rev up) Yet so close; yet so far away. I still believe those lines are highly charged. The market electrocuted itself in March when it touched them. We may be safer dancing slightly below MA lines until we have enough strength to leap over them and not touch it.