Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (167941)	5/23/2002 10:56:11 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

are you sure he wasn't quoting one of the most famous SI insults ever made.. and in jest? i think you should reconsider his banning. in fact, if he really meant to insult you, he should be elevated to moderator status due to the excellent calliber of the insult. however, someone else on SI made that insult. he was quoting. though i would have to search far and wider than my limited typing skills will allow to find it. i pray to you, oh baneminence, to spare the rod, and be a soloman, mercy sir.

To: Lucretius who wrote (167941)	5/23/2002 11:04:12 PM
From: Oblomov	Respond to of 436258

I think he was joking, barrister...

To: Lucretius who wrote (167941)	5/24/2002 9:38:23 AM
From: Mike M2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Luc, I don't think it was directed at you Crusader failed to clarify but he mentioned that it was not directed at you in a later post. I think Crusader is firmly in the bears camp ( TL & EV) and i don't recall him showing animosity towards any posters. He failed to qualify his quote but i believe him when he says they were not directed at you. It even looks like a quote who would take the time to compose such a verbose diatribe?. Mike