SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (258228)5/24/2002 1:38:41 AM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 769670
 
Published on Thursday, May 23, 2002 by CommonDreams.org
Attack of the Clowns: The Real Bush is Back
by Dean Baker

After the latest morbid turn in the Chandra Levy mystery, it appears that politics has now
come back full circle to where it was before September 11th. With the recent scandals
and miscues, the President is no longer Winston Churchill or Franklin Roosevelt, he is
once again the bungler from Texas who finished second in the presidential race. This
return to reality is good news – the nation should be paying attention to the president’s
agenda, not engaging in mindless hero worship.

And the agenda isn’t pretty. At the top of the list is an ill-defined quest to combat an “axis
of evil.” While we all want to stop terrorism, it is not clear that attacking the countries on
the president’s list is the best way to go about this task. The public has never been given
much of an explanation of the president’s plans. We just know that they will take a long
time, cost a lot of money, and probably lead to a lot of deaths. Some of the dead will
presumably be terrorists, but many others are likely to be innocent civilians, like the
people killed in the World Trade Center, and others will be our soldiers.

Domestically, the top of the president’s list still seems to be more tax breaks for the
wealthy. To President Bush, this means not just the old-fashioned tax breaks passed by
Congress – like the tax breaks from last summer – but also giving the wealthy and
corporations the opportunity to simply not pay taxes if they choose.

The papers have been filled with stories of corporations that escape most of their income
tax liability by opening a post office box in Bermuda. This rip-off could easily be remedied
by a law closing this loophole. But President Bush supports the loophole – corporations
shouldn’t have to pay taxes, if they find it inconvenient to do so. In the same vein, the
I.R.S. has cut back on its audits of wealthy taxpayers, in order to spend more time
auditing the returns of the working poor.

The President is also a vigorous supporter of a new bankruptcy law, the main effect of
which will be to put credit card and finance companies in more direct competition with kids
seeking child support from divorced parents. If the current laws made it too easy for
scofflaws to escape their debts, our mailboxes wouldn’t be filled with credit card offers
every day.

However, just as Bush has sought to make taxes voluntary for the rich, he has done the
same with repaying debts. The bankruptcy bill has a clause that will allow people to use
real estate to shield an unlimited amount of wealth from creditors. This means that a
millionaire Bush supporter can own a $10 million home – with no mortgage – declare
bankruptcy, and then tell his local grocer to get lost when she tries to collect on his tab.

President Bush has also come out in support of crony capitalism accounting rules that
allow corporate executives to write down almost anything they want on their financial
statements. This puts him at odds with just about every serious authority on financial
markets, including Alan Greenspan, Warren Buffet, and the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, the accounting profession’s internal policing body. He prefers standards
that will allow for many more Enrons.

President Bush has also opposed efforts to re-regulate California’s electricity market, even
as companies like Enron were developing their “Death Star” trading strategies to rip off
California’s consumers. To the president, higher profits for Enron were good news, even if
it meant soaring electric bills for small businesses and homeowners.

And of course, we can’t forget the president’s efforts to dismantle Social Security. At a
time when many stock certificates are looking like lottery tickets, the day after the
drawing, tens of millions of workers recognize Social Security as the only reliable source
of retirement income.

But where the rest of us see retirement security, the President sees money that could be
going to Wall Street. President Bush is trying to scare us into supporting his scheme by
questioning the program’s health, even though the Social Security trustees (four of whom
are President Bush’s cabinet members) report that Social Security is in better shape than
at any point in the first four decades of its operation.

The bottom line is that in President Bush’s America, the only genuinely safe investment is
a contribution to his re-election campaign. Stopping this assault on the nation’s well-being
will not be easy, but the first step is recognizing that the guy in the White House is
running a scam for his rich friends.

Dean Baker is currently Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research
(www.cepr.net) in Washington, D.C. He is co-author (with Mark Weisbrot) of Social
Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press) and writes the Economic
Reporting Review, a weekly analysis of media economic coverage. His analysis and
opinion pieces have appeared in the Atlantic Monthly, the Washington Post, the Los
Angeles Times, the Miami Herald, the Washington Times, and many other newspapers
throughout the country. He has also appeared on PBS' Lehrer Newshour, Fox News, NPR,
Counterspin, and numerous other television and radio programs.

CC



To: greenspirit who wrote (258228)5/24/2002 1:40:28 AM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 769670
 
Pirates of the Caribbean
Compared with U.S. Tycoons, Castro is Mickey Mouse
by John Balzar

President Bush was right to get himself all worked up this week about happenings in the
Caribbean. Only he picked the wrong target on the wrong island.

He should have been fuming about what's going on in Bermuda or Barbados, not Cuba.
That's where American values really are under siege.

Lately we've been hearing about the rush of U.S. companies trying to weasel out of their
taxes by moving the books offshore to the Caribbean. Now we're learning more: The result
of this exodus will be to enrich a few corporate executives with huge bonuses and
stock-option payouts. We probably shouldn't be surprised. As we see with the accounting
scandals that have engulfed corporate America, there's no gimmick too far-fetched or too
offensive so long as a tycoon can pocket a bigger fortune.

They want to sell American-ness to the world while selling out at home.

By comparison, Cuba is hardly a nuisance at all. Friends, if we can open an embassy in
Hanoi and offer the handshake of open trade to the communists there, must we maintain
this goofy estrangement from our Latin neighbor?

"We care about the people!" Bush said in his speech about Cuba.

Really? Cubans who were children when the Iron Curtain descended off Key West are now
grandparents. I'm sure they're relieved to know that the American president cares about
them--if only they would become brutish capitalists like the executives at Stanley tools.

In the spring of 2002, you don't have to stand back very far from the purple-blue waters of
the Gulf Stream to wonder, what does the U.S. stand for anyway?

It's not principle, that's for sure. Unless the principle is nothing more than: Do what you
have to do to take care of yourself.

So Bush travels to Florida and does what pandering politicians have been doing for years:
play to those one-issue Cuban American voters who are still sore because their dictator,
Fulgencio Batista, was overthrown in January 1959 by a new one who proved more
durable.

At the same time, the White House is deafeningly silent when the rapacious
corner-cutters in the corporate suites say they are doing only what they have to do, and
can: Setting up phony corporate shells in tax havens. Stuffing their wallets with millions,
with tens of millions, hundreds of millions in personal gain.

Funny, you didn't hear George-of-Privilege speaking out for "the people" on this one.

With a straight face, hired flacks for these companies say it only makes sense to pull out
of the United States. It's for the sake of shareholders, you see. But, sure enough, look
close and you discover that executives are going to make out even better--both in their
stock options and with those bonuses tied to how much they slash expenses.

What could be more perfect? Beg off from the basic tenet of citizenship and reward the
moral delinquents upstairs with millions more for their good thinking.

According to the New York Times, Chief Executive John M. Trani of Stanley Works, the
once-honorable tool company, stands to gain $385 million or so in stock option gains for
depriving the U.S. Treasury of $240 million in corporate taxes. The report listed four other
CEOs who stand to gain millions more for doing the same, and who can guess how many
more will follow suit.

Earlier this month, Stanley shareholders narrowly approved the offshore incorporation, but
the outcome was disputed. The company says another vote will be held. Just three years
ago, by the way, Stanley settled charges quietly with the Federal Trade Commission after
being accused of selling products that were labeled "Made in USA" but weren't.

This year, the Treasury Department said it was cracking down on individuals who banked
their fortunes offshore to escape the IRS. As for businesses doing the same, however, the
agency's assistant secretary for tax policy, Mark Weinberger, was more sympathetic. The
government understands, he told Congress, that there are "aspects of our tax system that
are driving companies" to reincorporate elsewhere. To wit, paying taxes.

Well, that's a lot of thanks from the executives at Stanley and these other all-American
companies, huh? They don't want to give up their good lives as U.S. residents. They're
peddling the USA brand at home and abroad. They expect to prosper globally thanks to
the stability of the U.S. and the might of its military and diplomacy. They benefit from the
strength of domestic institutions, like the stock market, the Federal Reserve, the judiciary
and the greenback. They draw talent from U.S. universities.

Yes, Mr. President, there are renegades in the Caribbean. Self-aggrandizers, they
stubbornly refuse to live up to our nation's great values.

These are the ones who need a tongue-lashing from the bully pulpit. After all, unlike Fidel
Castro, they claim to believe in the United States.

Copyright 2002 Los Angeles Times
CC



To: greenspirit who wrote (258228)5/24/2002 1:57:05 AM
From: Mr. Whist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
You're correct. I should not have posted that criticism of you via the third-party route. When I do that, I stoop to the level of Prolife, Ish, JLA and, the worst backstabber of them all, NeoConAgra. I apologize.