SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: StanX Long who wrote (64001)5/24/2002 3:06:19 AM
From: StanX Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
China cellphone makers face huge bill from radiation law
By Jonah Greenberg
Friday May 24, 12:56 PM

sg.news.yahoo.com

BEIJING (Reuters) - China may impose the world's toughest mobile phone radiation standards due to fears of health risks, telecoms officials said on Friday, threatening global cellphone makers with an expensive bill in their biggest market.

The country is mulling strict standards that would cap handset radiation emissions at half the levels allowed overseas, which the officials said could cost the industry billions of dollars to adjust equipment.

"If they set the standard that high, then handset makers would have to make changes to their operations ranging from R&D all the way to production," said Chen Yujian, director of the China Mobile Communications Association.

Chen said it could cost cellphone makers hundreds of millions of dollars. Industry officials said the move could hit local network operators harder, costing them $2.4 billion.

"It's not just a problem for us, it's a problem for the whole industry, including domestic vendors as well," said David Hartley, Nokia's top mobile phone executive in China.

Late last year, a government committee in charge of setting China's first cellphone safety standard aired ideas that were more conservative than most had expected, Chen said this week.

Explosive growth in mobile phones around the world has increased public debate over possible risks linked to the devices, although most authoritative studies have not concluded that regular users risk brain damage.