SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Newmont Mining(NEM) & Newmont Gold(NGC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Traveling Man who wrote (509)5/24/2002 11:05:56 AM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 587
 
No, it was ABX that merged with Homestake last year.



To: Traveling Man who wrote (509)5/24/2002 3:26:32 PM
From: freeus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 587
 
Did you make money by trading the gold stocks or shoring or just holding for a long time and then taking profits when you needed to?
Freeus



To: Traveling Man who wrote (509)5/24/2002 3:29:13 PM
From: freeus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 587
 
If the price of gold continues to go up do you think there will be expansion of mines so much that it depresses earnings and stock price? Or has there been enough consolidation of gold companies for that not to happen, iyo?
Freeus



To: Traveling Man who wrote (509)5/27/2002 10:56:42 AM
From: jim black  Respond to of 587
 
For the record, American Barrick, arch enemy of the non-hedgers for years, co-conspirator (if you believe in that
sort of thing) in central bank manipulation of gold, bought Homestake Mining. The history of Homestake is interesting as it was the oldest established gold mine in the USA. People who bought HM back before the '29 crash
made in divdidends alone many more times what they paid for the stock in just a few years, not counting what they paid for the stock, the price of which also made them a tidy profit. ABX bought it presumably to try to save its ass in the coming short squeeze skyrocket in the price of aurum.
JB