Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (147457)	5/24/2002 1:37:55 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580419

Ted, he wasn't being positive on AMD. He was being negative on INTC. Even Fleck sees AMD as nothing more than a company whose sole raison d'etre is to hurt INTC. That along with his other comments suggests that he is affected (at the very least) by the rhetoric from Jerry and the AMDroids. Tenchusatsu, Huh? The focus was Intel but his comments re AMD were positive, and I quote: "......and AMD's hammer product is, in my opinion, going to hammer Intel. Its a better processor and AMD will be able to deliver." EOQ. That's sounds pretty positive to me; however, its only as good as Fleck and his opinions. As for AMD's raison d'etre, well of course, Intel is AMD's number one competitor and really, its only competitor so why would they, say, make VTSS their raison d'etre. I think its time you jumped ship and got a job at AMD. <g> BTW, do you think it will ever get warm in the NW this year? Damn, I expect it to snow any day now!! Where's global warming when you need it? ted