Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (165402)	5/24/2002 1:17:11 PM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tenchusatsu, RE: Ah, that short-term memory kicks in once again. In case you haven't noticed, Hammer is already a year late. You have the integrity of a Wall Street analyst. At least no one is paying you for your B.S. You make it sound like that is some sort of positive trait. If someone is going to sell their integrity to the highest bidder, they might as well get paid for it.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (165402)	5/24/2002 1:29:13 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"Dan, <Hammer is ahead of schedule> Ah, that short-term memory kicks in once again. In case you haven't noticed, Hammer is already a year late." Let's see... Everyone thought Hammer wouldn't intro until Q1, 2003...maybe December 02'...So if it shows up in October it's 3 months early. Of course at that point it will only be 9 months to a year late based on earlier road maps... There are some indications that it will be available earlier than most recent expectations. Once again it appears that AMDs slippage has backed them into a corner. So they finally "get it" and move more resources to getting Hammer out ASAP. Jim