SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (13403)5/25/2002 12:02:21 AM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
First time I've heard that theory. How proven is proven? And would a kimberlite level trees a hundred miles around?



To: average joe who wrote (13403)5/25/2002 12:17:57 AM
From: Dayuhan  Respond to of 21057
 
Tunguska has been proven not to have been a meteorite but a very small kimberlite.

The title of the abstract you cite:

The 1908 Tunguska Catastrophe: a forming kimberlite?

Please note the punctuation at the end of the title. The question mark is generally an indication that the thesis in question is something other than "proven".


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News