Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (80704)	5/25/2002 5:07:28 AM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: P858 was the process code for Intels .18u process .13u Even early P858 had .09 gate lengths.

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (80704)	5/30/2002 1:27:35 AM
From: burn2learn	Respond to of 275872

What I meant without giving away yield data was that The initial transfer of P860 seems to be good based on Qtrly reports. I suspect 1260 to be good also. Due to human nature, I guess 1262, 862, ect to not be as good. I say this without knowing yield data, or even seeing these on a roadmap. I know nothing. BUT I do know that people get cocky with success and forget what made them successful. Thus the big wheel keeps on turning. The more I have to look into what is public and what is not will be the factor in if I continue to post. I don't have time to post often, I don't have time to research all public data before posting. I don't want to jeopardize my professional success, therefore I'll post as I think I can. If I get out of line, let me know.....I will stop