Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peter michaelson who wrote (76653)	5/26/2002 12:10:50 AM
From: Ga Bard	Respond to of 122087

Hey pay back is heck isn't it. :-) Gary

To: peter michaelson who wrote (76653)	5/26/2002 12:16:14 AM
From: Captain Jack	Respond to of 122087

peter michaelson-- most likely nearly all subscribers are 'squeeky clean'. Ben Cartwright died long ago--- at least at the time the tech bubble burst. It is for just the reasons you state there will be no big deal made of the people that subscribed. If there is anything found on any individual it would most likely be something unrelated to the association,,, like failing to report income,, as you mentioned. If found it will be dealt with on an individual basis. No agency has enough to gain by going on a witch hunt of those that subscribed... especially as the civil side could blow up and cause excessive & unwarranted litigation.

To: peter michaelson who wrote (76653)	5/26/2002 12:40:13 AM
From: heronwater	Respond to of 122087

I'm about the most squeeky clean person you will ever find You also have a kind heart and gentle spirit. Nobody can ever take that away from you Peter :-) It was a pleasure and a privilege spending time with you.

To: peter michaelson who wrote (76653)	5/26/2002 11:05:20 AM
From: semperfijarhead	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

I don't think it is wise to assume everyone on his site is going to be eventually indicted. I do think it is wise to assume everyone will be scrutinized by the government. I don't think it is wise to assume no one but Elgindy, Peters, and Royer will be indicted. Do you not think it quite possible that the government will go for the little guy in hopes of finding a turncoat. Someone in this mess is going to give it up to protect him or herself. The question is who and when. Elgindy himself may turnover if there is a bigger fish to catch. Would the Feds plead him out to lesser charges to uncover the moles in the government. Or would the two moles already captured simply rat out Elgindy for a lesser charge. Having said all of that, I do have a question for you. Do you have any idea/speculation as to why all monies were going to be funneled to Lebanon?