To: Little Joe who wrote (5241 ) 5/26/2002 5:02:55 PM From: paul ross Respond to of 8010 I think Butler's point is that both the cash and futures markets are manipulated. The nearly 1 bill.ounces he claims has been leased has been sold into the spot market to depress prices there. He argues that it is the futures market where the manipulation can most clearly be seen. You make an interesting point about the spot market driving the futures.I would agree that if any sort of silver spike were to develop it would start in the cash market. My own theory is that CBs behind the scene, starting with the Washington Accord on gold leasing in 1998, have seen the explosive potential this leasing mess could cause and have taken steps in both gold and silver to prevent any price spikes caused by the leasing deficit. The leasing will unwind in an orderly fashion and the POG and POS, by their plan, will seek its equilibrium level. However, many who have leased their silver, gold will not receive it back, will settle for cash payment. If silver is to see any dramatic price increase I feel it will be led by investor demand,much like in the late 70's. The available above ground supplies of silver, its decreasing/increasing yearly deficit, the decreasing use for photogr., increasing use for fuel cells, medicinal usages, etc. etc. may have little effect vs. a change in investor psychology from equities to hard assets. Net investor demand was positive last year for the first time in the last 10 years, a 110M ounce turnaround. If just a couple percent of this* money were put into gold and silver, the "recommended" 5% in times of uncertainty, there might then be a significant rise: *http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/020525/column_stocks_week_1.html