Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mad2 who wrote (76761)	5/26/2002 1:59:51 PM
From: semperfijarhead	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Step back from the situation and look at it from the eyes of someone who has never heard of Elgindy but has heard about the ongoing scandal of the Phoenix memo. If that person were to hear that he had bribed two FBI agents, and then heard allegations it is possible he knew about 9/11...would that take the heat OFF the FBI or possibly add to it?

To: Mad2 who wrote (76761)	5/26/2002 2:03:12 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

If an individual or individuals were contacted with prior knowledge of the attack and someone, however loosely, connected with this individual or individuals is said to also have had such prior knowledge, might not those who initiated the contact begin a discreet yet possibly traceable inquiry into how this loosely connected individual received the prior knowledge? If there WAS prior knowledge communicated the loosely connected individual wouldn't necessarily have to have received it. Just the "suggestion" that he did may be enough.