Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (71674)	5/26/2002 7:06:54 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 99280

Justa: That is just what I mean.....Zeev fully loaded on 3/28....Then we were down 50 naz points 2 days later...... Does anyone think Zeev's calls are weak, and inaccurate ......Where was Zeev..? uptrend? downtrend? Now that Larry is officially tracking Zeev's calls it will be much harder for Zeev to shuck and jive his way out of the hard questions.... Good Luck, MJ

To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (71674)	5/26/2002 7:35:46 PM
From: thecalculator	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Here is another 'shorter term' call that may not have worked out: Message 16993193 At the time, Zeev indicated that a local bottom had been put in, that would last about a week: siliconinvestor.com , but the nasdaq went down instead. But his longer term call for 1793/1757 (http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=16994789) to happen roughly a month later was pretty good.

To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (71674)	5/26/2002 8:08:56 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 99280

Actually, I was already pretty fully loaded on the March 26 (#reply-17247864), but frankly, I had expected a strong post April first rally, and it took me till April 3rd (#reply-17282470) and an exchange with Larry and others about the "blown call") to realize it was not the real McCoy, and reentered around April 10th (I believe at 1733 or so). Unfortunately, I expected 1930 to be the top, and we reached only half way to 1830, I did not "capitulate" until 1757 was breached on the 22nd, I believe. So if Larry needs to "keep the score", he needs to add another failed buy at 3/26 and a whipsaw sell on 4/3, before the failed buy at 4/10. What can I say, the market is at fault, it refused to deliver on the "liquidity driven" drive to 1930 (vbg), and thus the turnips failed for about a month (March 20 or so to April 22) being out of synch with the market. That happens more often than I like it to happen, but it peeves me when they get me in for declines, I don't mind when they keep me out and the market continues its advance (like In November, when I already had a full year of profits under my belt in just two months). Zeev