Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AD who wrote (76823)	5/26/2002 10:49:55 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

>>>it sounds to me like you're simply jumping on a bandwagon created by an irresponsible prosecuting attorney<<< Just out of curiosity, how do you know that the prosecuting attorney is an "irresponsible" one? >>>Whatever the results of the investigation and possible trial are, I sincerely doubt you have any authority or knowledge whatever, to draw any conclusions worth consideration.<<< I guess I gotta ask again: How are you able to conclude that this prosecuting attorney, who hasn't even yet prosecuted the case, is "irresponsible?" Qualification: I don't know whether the prosecuter is or is not. My personal opinion about the Anthony matter sits on hold until I learn more information. However, I'm just trying to ascertain whether your second paragraph that I've quoted above comports with your first paragraph that I've quoted above.

To: AD who wrote (76823)	5/28/2002 8:50:36 AM
From: KZAP	Respond to of 122087

To:Wolff who wrote (246) From: Pluvia Monday, May 29, 2000 9:59 PM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 442 Amir Elgindy - A Changed Man? "SCAM DOGS AND MO-MO MAMAS" by John R. Emshwiller *************** Page 140 Though he avoided criminal sanctions, Elgindy felt the ripples of the Armstrong, Mckinley debacle for years afterwards. In 1997, for instance, Ohio regulators rejected his application for a securities broker license in that state. According to the report by the state hearing examiner, Elgindy was "not of 'good business repute'." Among other things, the hearing examiner found that the broker had altered a letter from a former Armstrong McKinley client and then submitted it in the Ohio licensing case. The client a Dr Laila Gomaa won $30,000 in an arbitration complaint against the brokerage firm, and it's principles, including Elgindy. To bolster his argument that others at the firm were responsible for her losses, Elgindy obtained a letter from Dr. Gomaa absolving him of any misdeeds. Elgindy submitted the letter. But then the hearing examiner called the doctor. According to his report, she said she recognized only part of the letter and that a large chunk of it was different from what she had sent Elgindy. The hearing examiner found that Elgindy had altered the letter before submitting it. Like other parts of Elgindy's life, this incident has an unusual twist. The unhappy client, Laila Gomaa, was also Elgindy's mother. ******************* Beware of eating while reading this book. Upon reading this I spewed a mushroom a good 8ft onto a wall...