Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JRandleman who wrote (76824)	5/26/2002 10:42:57 PM
From: AD	Respond to of 122087

<<<Overvalued? Well, they sure decreased in value after Tony and Club got hold of 'em!>>> I dare you to buy the stock of companies he found to be shams. You aren't that dumb are you? If they are so good, the mkt will bounce them back. Manipulators can move stocks temporarily, but rarely fight true market forces permantly. take hundreds of internet follies......now THEY did some serious scamming. They took the money of millions of investors and had virtually no hope of ever becoming a productive, profitable enterprise. The truth willed out and many of them are history or on their way. Go ahead, buy the beaten down stocks anthony 'smacked down', I dare you AD

To: JRandleman who wrote (76824)	5/27/2002 1:17:23 PM
From: mmmary	Respond to of 122087

icyghoul, again, these are just accusations '..coordinated the release of negative, and sometimes false information with short selling in a manner designed to exaggerate the negative market sentiment for the stock.' We don't know if the above is true or not. I'm sure the CEO of NSOL probably told the FBI that it's all lies like they always do but how do WE really know. Tony did have that bet going if people could find any inaccuracies in his reports, he'd give them $500. He offered $10,000 on SLPH report. I couldn't find any errors. >Overvalued? Well, they sure decreased in value after Tony and Club got hold of 'em! With so many scammy loser stocks on the otcbb, he didn't have to make this stuff up. He didn't target 100% honest and successful companies. Just pick one of the many big overvalued losers, do some honest DD, if you find something bad, release an honest report and short it til the cows come home. >It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy if he makes a call of an 'overvalued' and thinly-traded OTCBB stock and then pummels it with heavy short interest and disparaging messageboard comments from he and his alleged 'Enterprise'. If the losers he targeted didn't have suspect management, misleading press releases, products that weren't as good as touted, fake office addresses, fake trade agreements, problems with the SEC...then tony would have had nothing to expose. I don't believe you can go to XYZ company board and post that the CEO has bad breath and expect the share price to drop. There had to be some honest bad dirt on the company. It had to be a bad investment. There are a ton of overvalued dogs on the otcbb. He'd pick the biggest dog not the most honest, successful company. That wouldn't make any sense when it's easier to out real dogs with real bad news then to make up lies about honest successful companies.