Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: campe who wrote (76841)	5/27/2002 12:34:39 AM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 122087

I was searching for something else and came across this one. It's an example of an opening volley: Message 15329891 Didn't Truthseeker--now posting as CraigGoon.com--and Anthony@Pacific have a falling out? What was that all about? As I recall, they used to be like a Marvel Comic-- depending on your position--Hero or Villain Marvel Team-Up thing going.

To: campe who wrote (76841)	5/27/2002 12:41:14 AM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Respond to of 122087

What ticked me off about the findings was that A@P was telling folks to unite and buy and NOT sell short, while he was doing the exact opposite. I agree, but that does not prove he is guilty of this dramatic and awful charge of knowing about the 9/11 atrocities in advance. That prosecutor must prove this charge without delay, or else he has behaved in a most immoral and unethical manner. I truly hope many of of you, whatever your opinion of A. and his activities, will agree with me on this point. Throwing out innuendo without proof - well, put it this way: Today a prosecutor has employed these tactics on A., tomorrow he, or another emboldened by his success, may use them upon you. Think about that, all of you. Look at history, then see where that leads us. If the statements related to A.'s brokerage communications are in fact true, then it seems clear A. was exhorting his members to buy, while he in fact was selling, at a minimum, his children's holdings. This is most dishonest behavior, and for that, A. should be called to account, both here at SI and elsewhere. Simply because others have done the same does not excuse this immoral and unethical behavior. I still feel that if A. is to be crucified in this way, it would be an outrage if those who enjoy far more power, who have done far more damage through similar activities, are left to take pleasure in their ill-gotten millions - and, on a corporate level, the investment banks, billions - without any consequences accruing to them as well. Enough of us who are honest and law-abiding here, and in the public at large rise in one voice to demand an accounting, then perhaps justice will be served. Though I know that is a tall order, not speaking up in the face of evil - yes, evil, that which has destroyed so many lives the past several years - is not an option for those of you who care about this country, and that for which it stands.