SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tadsamillionaire who wrote (12696)5/27/2002 1:12:33 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
Perhaps this will be the 2nd conviction for Ashcroft. The first so far is of the alien that came to the FBI to help. This guy, we can get for 'falsely implying'....which appears the only felony charge they have on him. That 'implying' part is really despicable.

It sure is great that the Justice department is starting to emulate the justice system of Zimbabwe.

You overlooked a benefit he has...he's got a copy of the Koran. He's a Roman Catholic, but if he was somewhere else they wouldn't give him a copy of the Koran.

jttmab



To: Tadsamillionaire who wrote (12696)5/27/2002 1:23:10 PM
From: jttmab  Respond to of 93284
 
This one should give you a warm tummy feeling....

Agent Claims FBI Supervisor Thwarted Probe
Stopping Some Hijackers Said Possible

By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, May 27, 2002; Page A01

The FBI might have been able to stop some of the Sept. 11 hijackers if it had more aggressively pursued an investigation of alleged terrorist conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui, who was in custody for more than three weeks prior to the attacks, the FBI's chief lawyer in Minneapolis wrote in a blistering letter to headquarters last week.

Coleen Rowley, in a highly unusual and bitter letter to FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, was particularly critical of a supervisory special agent at FBI headquarters, whom she accused of "consistently, almost deliberately, thwarting the Minnesota FBI efforts."

Even on the morning of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the Washington supervisor instructed Rowley and her colleagues to hold off on action against Moussaoui, arguing that his arrest after suspicious behavior at a flight school was probably a coincidence, the letter said.

Moussaoui, who is thought by U.S. officials to have been training as the "20th hijacker," now faces a death-penalty trial in Alexandria for alleged complicity in the attacks.

"Although I agree it's very doubtful that the full scope of the tragedy could have been prevented, it's at least possible we could have gotten lucky and uncovered one or two more of the terrorists in flight training prior to Sept. 11, just as Moussaoui was discovered, after making contact with his flight instructors," Rowley wrote.

Brimming with indignation and at times personally critical of Mueller, Rowley's correspondence provides the most pointed indictment yet of the FBI's failure to properly read clues available before Sept. 11 that al Qaeda terrorists seemed focused on aviation. The claims in Rowley's letter are the most specific allegations to date that U.S. officials may have been in a position to at least diminish the attacks.

The single-spaced, 13-page, footnoted letter -- revealed in snippets last week after it was delivered to Mueller and congressional intelligence committees -- was first reported in its entirety yesterday by Time magazine, which posted an edited copy on its Web site.

FBI spokesman Steven Berry declined to comment yesterday on the letter, which is considered classified by the FBI.

In her letter, Rowley sought protection under the federal whistleblower statute, and Mueller has referred her complaints to the Justice Department's inspector general for investigation.

Senior FBI officials in Washington, including Mueller, have for months insisted that the bureau did everything it could to ascertain Moussaoui's intentions. They have said they aimed to secure a warrant for a laptop computer found in Moussaoui's possession, but that FBI attorneys -- including Rowley -- had agreed there was not enough evidence to do so under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

In the days leading up to Sept. 11, officials have said, U.S. law enforcement put in place a plan to rapidly deport Moussaoui under heavy guard to Paris, where French authorities would take possession of the laptop and use more aggressive statutes there to examine it.

"The fact that there were a number of individuals that happened to have received training at flight schools here is news, quite obviously," Mueller said on Sept. 15. "If we had understood that to be the case, we would have -- perhaps one could have averted this."

To Rowley and her colleagues in Minneapolis, such statements were misleading at best and ignored significant evidence that could have been used to pry open Moussaoui's laptop and possibly learn more about the impending plot.

Rowley said Minneapolis agents were hampered at every turn by bureaucrats in Washington, who allegedly resisted seeking a warrant, sought to micromanage the case and admonished the field agents when, in desperation, they turned to the CIA for help.

Rowley is especially critical of one supervisory special agent (SSA) at headquarters, who was "consistently, almost deliberately, thwarting the Minnesota FBI efforts," according to the letter.

At one point, Rowley alleges, the unnamed SSA changed a warrant application in such a way that FBI lawyers would be more likely to reject it, as they did.

Headquarters, Rowley said, "continued to almost inexplicably throw up roadblocks and undermine Minneapolis's by now desperate efforts to obtain a FISA search warrant, long after the French intelligence service provided its information and probable cause became clear. HQ personnel brought up almost ridiculous questions in their apparent efforts to undermine the probable cause."

What's more, Rowley wrote, she and her co-workers were dismayed further by the reactions of FBI officials to revelations this month about another case in Phoenix.

FBI agent Kenneth Williams, who was investigating possible terrorists at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, Ariz., wrote to headquarters July 10 suggesting that U.S. aviation schools should be canvassed and raising the possibility Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network might be trying to infiltrate the aviation field.

The request was formally closed within a few weeks, and it was never acted upon. The Radical Fundamentalists Unit, a recipient of the Phoenix memo, also never connected Williams's suggestions with the investigation of Moussaoui a month later, officials have said.

Mueller told the Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month that, although the Phoenix memo should have been pursued more aggressively, it would not have led investigators to the Sept. 11 plot.

"I don't know how you or anyone at FBI Headquarters, no matter how much genius or prescience you may possess, could so blithely make this affirmation without anything to back the opinion up than your stature as FBI Director," Rowley wrote. "The truth is, as with most predictions into the future, no one will ever know what impact, if any, the FBI's following up on those requests would have had."

In addition to criticizing the handling of the Moussaoui case, Rowley is blistering in her condemnation of FBI culture, which she portrays as dominated by careerists who are too afraid of internal discipline to be aggressive in their work. In addition, Rowley complains that headquarters staff involved in the Moussaoui case were central to the post-Sept. 11 probe and that the SSA most to blame was actually promoted.

The FBI enforces a "double standard which results in those of lower rank being investigated more aggressively and dealt with more harshly for misconduct, while the misconduct of those at the top is often overlooked or results in minor disciplinary action."

Rowley also takes aim at Mueller's plans to create an anti-terrorism "super squad" at FBI headquarters in Washington, which would control all terrorism cases and would rely heavily on a centralized Office of Intelligence. Rowley, a 21-year FBI veteran, argues in her letter that the Moussaoui and Phoenix incidents show that FBI headquarters is the problem, not the solution.

Staff writer Ellen Nakashima contributed to this report.

© 2002 The Washington Post Company
washingtonpost.com



To: Tadsamillionaire who wrote (12696)5/27/2002 1:54:00 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
I suppose jla would say that William Safire isn't god, but here's William's read on the Minneapolis memo....

The Rowley Memo
By WILLIAM SAFIRE

WASHINGTON
Why did F.B.I. Director Robert Mueller desperately stamp "classified" on last week's memo to him from the Minneapolis agent and counsel Coleen Rowley?

Answer: Because he is protecting the bureau's crats who ignored warnings from the field before Sept. 11, and because he is trying to cover his own posterior for misleading the public and failing to inform the president in the eight months since.

In an example of gutsy newsmagazine journalism, Time reports this week on "The Bombshell Memo: How the FBI Blew the Case." The entire 6,000-word memo from the field agent who dared to blow the whistle — edited presumably for national security and libel — can be found on the Web site of time.com.

Last summer, the Phoenix field office, on the trail of a couple of radical Islamists, recommended strongly that F.B.I. headquarters examine flight schools around the nation for potential terrorists; the Washington bureaucrats did nothing.

Soon after, Minneapolis agents took action to jail another radical, Zacarias Moussaoui, a French citizen now accused as "the 20th hijacker," for overstaying his visa. The agents asked F.B.I. headquarters for permission to examine his laptop computer. Permission was denied, despite reports from French intelligence relayed from our Paris embassy of his involvement with international terrorists. Not until after Sept. 11 did we learn it contained the phone number of Mohamed Atta's roommate.

Intimidated by the brouhaha about supposed ethnic profiling of Wen Ho Lee, lawyers at John Ashcroft's Justice Department wanted no part of going after this Arab. F.B.I. Washington bureaucrats were, in agent Rowley's words, "consistently, almost deliberately thwarting the Minneapolis F.B.I. agents' efforts."

To this day, Mueller — Eric Holder's gift to Justice, held over by an entranced Ashcroft and determined to protect his benefactor from embarrassment — insists that even an unencumbered investigation would not have stopped 9/11. Not so, says Rowley; her memo told Mueller last week that his protestation was "an apparent effort to protect the F.B.I. from embarrassment and the relevant F.B.I. officials from scrutiny."

She asserts that "discovery of other terrorist pilots prior to September 11th may have limited the attacks and resulting loss of life" and "your statements demonstrate a rush to judgment to protect the F.B.I. at all costs."


This is an unprecedented indictment not only of the time-servers at Justice and F.B.I. headquarters last summer, but also of the director who has been insisting that the bureau is blameless ever since. Rowley, a 21-year veteran of the F.B.I. and mother of four (superagent and supermom), suggests that Mueller's men have been neglecting their duty to report potential violations of relevant directives to the president's Intelligence Oversight Board (as if that sleepy gang would lift a finger).

I was struck by déjà vu in her account of headquarters' dismissal of the warning from French intelligence about the suspect detained in Minneapolis. Higher-ups told the field agents that maybe it was another Zacarias Moussaoui — just as the spooks at C.I.A. told reporters that the Arab photographed meeting an Iraqi spymaster in Prague was another man with the name of Mohamed Atta.

Last week, recalling last August's request by George W. Bush to the C.I.A.'s George Tenet for a memo detailing the terrorist threat inside the U.S., I opined that the president had asked the wrong man. The officer charged with that responsibility is the director of the F.B.I., and the C.I.A. chief failed to ask the F.B.I. for his information. That would have blasted loose the suppressed reports from Phoenix and Minneapolis.

In unattributable response, a "senior administration official" claimed that some analyst at C.I.A. talked to somebody down the line at the F.B.I. That's foof dust; when the president needs to know the threat, our national security staff must knock top heads to provide it quickly and thoroughly.

Instead of identifying and promoting the best antiterrorist field agents experienced in operating within the U.S., as Rowley suggests, Director Mueller is importing from the C.I.A. a flock of analysts he touts as a "super squad." That compounds his mistakes and may undermine law enforcement. The C.I.A. and F.B.I. can work more closely together while remaining distinctly apart.

Mr. Bush: don't tear down that wall.

nytimes.com



To: Tadsamillionaire who wrote (12696)5/27/2002 2:02:21 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Re: JMHO I am glad someone is watching out for the American Publics interests after 9-11.

IMHO, the detention of aliens after 9-11 has little to do with the interests of the American public. It rather has to do with the interests of the Attorney General and the FBI, who need to look like their doing something. Now that they've throw a lot of them in detention and don't particularly have anything significant to charge them with...they can't just let them go...that would make them look like dummies.

jttmab



To: Tadsamillionaire who wrote (12696)5/27/2002 3:04:20 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Coleen Rowley's Memo to FBI Director Robert Mueller
An edited version of the agent's 13-page letter

May 21, 2002

FBI Director Robert Mueller
FBI Headquarters Washington, D.C.

Dear Director Mueller:

I feel at this point that I have to put my concerns in writing concerning the important topic of the FBI's response to evidence of terrorist activity in the United States prior to September 11th. The issues are fundamentally ones of INTEGRITY and go to the heart of the FBI's law enforcement mission and mandate. Moreover, at this critical juncture in fashioning future policy to promote the most effective handling of ongoing and future threats to United States citizens' security, it is of absolute importance that an unbiased, completely accurate picture emerge of the FBI's current investigative and management strengths and failures.

To get to the point, I have deep concerns that a delicate and subtle shading/skewing of facts by you and others at the highest levels of FBI management has occurred and is occurring. The term "cover up" would be too strong a characterization which is why I am attempting to carefully (and perhaps over laboriously) choose my words here. I base my concerns on my relatively small, peripheral but unique role in the Moussaoui investigation in the Minneapolis Division prior to, during and after September 11th and my analysis of the comments I have heard both inside the FBI (originating, I believe, from you and other high levels of management) as well as your Congressional testimony and public comments.

I feel that certain facts, including the following, have, up to now, been omitted, downplayed, glossed over and/or mis-characterized in an effort to avoid or minimize personal and/or institutional embarrassment on the part of the FBI and/or perhaps even for improper political reasons: ...........

time.com

jttmab