Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tahoe_bound who wrote (30954)	5/28/2002 4:29:19 AM
From: tahoe_bound	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

May 26, 2002 The world holds its breath Old foes India and Pakistan inch ever closer to nuclear war By ERIC MARGOLIS -- Contributing Foreign Editor LONDON -- India and Pakistan are on the verge of a catastrophic war over Kashmir: 1.4 million troops from the two nations are poised for battle from the Tibet border to the Arabian Sea. The two old foes are trading artillery barrages along the Kashmir ceasefire line. Pakistan's and India's nuclear arsenals are on hair-trigger alert, as political leaders and generals on both sides play nuclear chicken over divided Kashmir. India boxed itself into a diplomatic corner by proclaiming it would go to war against Pakistan unless Islamic separatists stopped attacking its garrisons in the Indian-ruled portion of Kashmir - attacks India blames on raiders from Pakistan, but Pakistan insists are staged by Kashmiri insurgents inside Indian Kashmir. But the attacks continued, leaving India's government, dominated by militant Hindu nationalists, looking inept and helpless. 13-year-old uprising The 750,000 troops India now has massed in Kashmir have proven unable to suppress the 13-year-old uprising by Kashmir's Muslim majority against Indian rule. India insists the dirty guerrilla war in Kashmir, in which 60,000 people have died, is entirely the work of Pakistan. In fact, India faces a genuine popular uprising by the Muslim majority. Pakistan aids some of the rebel groups, though not all. Now, Delhi is threatening to unleash its army, either to stage limited attacks against insurgent bases inside Pakistani Kashmir, or in a general offensive against Pakistan proper, a massive operation that could quickly escalate into nuclear war. Pakistan has recently found itself squeezed between the United States and India. It continues to discreetly support the Kashmir "intifada" while officially claiming it has ceased support for trans-border insurgent attacks - which the U.S. brands "Islamic terrorism," but Pakistanis term a legitimate liberation struggle by an oppressed people. Pakistan, which is outnumbered and outgunned by seven-times larger India, has made it clear it may respond to any major Indian ground attacks with tactical nuclear weapons. India's High Command has taken this threat very seriously. Even limited Indian commando attacks on insurgent bases in Pakistani Kashmir could rapidly escalate into full-scale conventional, then nuclear war. So India's government has resisted populist clamour to attack Pakistan, though Delhi's generals are itching to have a go at their old foe. By contrast, Pakistan showed in its 1999 incursion into Indian-ruled Ladakh that it was willing to risk a limited military operation in spite of the nuclear threat. India and Pakistan need to be given a face-saving way out of this confrontation. But India has long refused outside mediation of Kashmir, which it deems an internal matter, though the UN repeatedly called for a plebiscite to determine the desires of the state's people: independence; remaining part of India; or joining Pakistan. Pakistan has sought to internationalize the Kashmir dispute for half a century. Any concession by one side will thus be seen as a major victory for its foe. The Bush administration is urgently seeking to defuse the crisis between Delhi and Islamabad, fearing it is undermining U.S. efforts to hunt Osama bin Laden and turn Pakistan into a major base of operations in the war against terrorism. However,Washington's clumsy policies have played a key role in the latest crisis, as this column warned last fall when Washington signed an "anti-terrorist" pact with India. Delhi took the agreement to be carte blanche to go after Pakistan. Inadvertent encouragement By foolishly branding Kashmir separatists as "Islamic terrorists," the Bush administration inadvertently encouraged India to follow the U.S. example in Afghanistan by striking at "terrorist" bases inside Pakistani Kashmir. Now, to India's understandable anger, the White House is furiously back-pedalling and calling on Delhi for "restraint" - something it certainly failed to show in Afghanistan. With tensions at the breaking point, another bloody incident, such as the December attack on India's Parliament, or last week's raid on an Indian Army base in southern Kashmir, could finally provoke an Indian attack. This means the fate of South Asia may well be in the hands of militant "jihadi," - or holy warriors - in Pakistan and Indian Kashmir who believe an Indo-Pakistani conflict would somehow liberate Kashmir and drive the Americans from Afghanistan and Pakistan. One of these shadowy groups mounted the December attack on India's parliament, which provoked India to declare its own, George Bush-style "total war against terrorism." India could attack at any moment, even as early as this weekend. The powerful Indian Navy is on war station in the Arabian Sea, ready to blockade Karachi, cutting off Pakistan's imports and exports, including oil. War fever is overcoming caution. A wrong move, new attack, or even a mistake, could plunge 20% of humankind into disaster.