SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: semperfijarhead who wrote (77018)5/28/2002 8:36:47 PM
From: mmmary  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
I wasn't a member of the club

so I can't answer your questions. I don't believe he ever posted that information on a public thread or in his site or PRs. Also, I've spoken to FBI guys and they're shared information with me that I've even posted on the boards. I've had others tell me what FBI agents have told them. If this is illegal, why'd did they tell me this information and why didn't they tell me it was illegal for them to do so. I believed they were sharing information with me so I could help them with their cases. Same with SEC agents. They also never told me not to share the info or make it public. Who's in the wrong here?



To: semperfijarhead who wrote (77018)5/28/2002 8:44:24 PM
From: Bear Down  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
Did Tony tell his subscribers that he was getting information from the FBI or any other governmental agency?

And comming from Tony and being as ubsurd as that sounds would anyone in their right mind believe it to be a matter of fact?

If anyone needs a witness as to whether Tony is a liar or not I don't think it will be too hard to find. So do you think a liar should be believed in the one instance that hindsight proves he might actually be telling the truth?