Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (77045)	5/28/2002 9:47:19 PM
From: Due Diligence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Really amazed with such quick responses to a post. Are some monitering this thread, minute by minute? WHY????????????? Hope the FBI is...................

To: PartyTime who wrote (77045)	5/28/2002 9:59:24 PM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

IFFFFFFF he did truly was involved in 911 then I would agree with you. But what if he had nothing to do with 911 and is unjustly charged with that crime just because the FBI is trying to help their image? I personally believe that he is 100% innocent of the 911 charges. I believe they are using it against him to deny him bail so he won't get a fair shake at a trial, call him a flight risk, get the RICO charges against him to take all his assets so he can't defend himself, leave him in jail labeled a terrorist so that the inmates can physically abuse him... and basically wear him down to maybe pleading to a lessor offense just so the FBI can have a clean and quick case. A question for you. Would you rather free a murderer or send an innocent man to the death chamber? Which error of justice is worse to you?