SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (48502)5/29/2002 10:56:25 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I have no objective with respect to CH. I simply respond to what I perceive to be the self-serving commentary designed to justify his sad behavior during the last several months. The more the CH Cabal (you, X, and Neo) obsesses over the CH criticizers, the longer this soap opera continues. Frankly, everything I read from the cabal smacks of attempted rationalization for your allegiance to an obviously flawed position.



To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (48502)5/29/2002 10:56:37 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
What exactly is your objective at this point with respect to CH?

I hope you get your answer. I understood what this was about when the objective was to provide a safe place for Poet to post. At that point, universal cooperation was necessary. At this point, I don't see the relevance of continued insistance on a loyalty oath.



To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (48502)5/29/2002 10:58:35 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 82486
 
Neither you or JLA ever answered my question...

No one expects the Spanish Inquisition.....<g>

I must have missed the question. I did not see it previously stated.

In answer, I can only speak for myself by saying that I have no particular "objective". I am disgusted by what I saw and I plan to comment as I feel it appropriate. Same as always. I had no particular affection for Poet, in fact there was little I ever agreed with her about but I had no real animus either. She did insult me once and apologized for it. I found that to be rather classy. I'm not sure there is much to "advance" at this point in respect of this matter. As for hounding CH off SI it was not my intent (where's the fun in that), and realistically if he was not embarrassed enough to leave voluntarily as a consequence of his actions with respect to Poet, then, IMO I see little possibility of that happenstance.

JLA



To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (48502)5/29/2002 12:57:06 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 82486
 
How about I don't like amoral, unethical, bullying sleazeballs? Clear enough?

Frankly, the way it sounds to me, is that you all want to hound CH off SI altogether ...
'Tis a consumation devoutly to be wished, but more unlikely than a blizzard in hell.

He thrives on this attention. He loves it. He glories in it. Better bad press than no ink at all.