Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Spitz who wrote (77102)	5/29/2002 1:00:20 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 122087

>>>Also keep in mind that when prosecuters smell blood, they go all out to make a name for themselves. They probably know that not all of the charges are sound, but will try to use less solid ones as throw-aways in case plea bargaining comes into play, or to make the more solid charges seem more likely.<<< I made a similar point in an earlier post. Yup, the bail hearing frequently is a pile-on. But in this case, and with 9/11 being so sensitive and many unanswered questions still lingering relative to international finance, I think the point needed to be made. Do note that the prosecutor, responsibly made the comment in his argument that Elgindy may never be charged for 9/11-related acts. I think, right now, it seems like everything is in balance for the upcoming trial which the media will likely sensationalize in the usual extraordinary ways. Where it all seems like more than a tickle is the operative question: Whose gonna get washed into the wake from all of this and it seems like some of the traditional short side gangbangers are a bit nervous. Rightfully so. Call me long on justice. Ironically, Elgindy right now is long on justice since he sits in a presumption of innocence.