Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Murrey Walker who wrote (31112)	5/30/2002 12:51:40 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Bush Sends Rumsfeld to S. Asia Thu May 30,12:39 PM ET By GEORGE GEDDA Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush (news - web sites) on Thursday urged Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf to "live up to his word" and stop cross-border attacks in Kashmir (news - web sites). He also will send Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to help ease tensions between India and Pakistan. Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) has already announced that his top aide, Richard Armitage, will go to the region next week as part of a broader international effort to prevent a war between the nuclear-powered neighbors. "We are making it very clear to both Pakistan and India that war will not serve their interests, " Bush said after a Cabinet meeting. "We are part of an international coalition applying pressure to both parties." In particular, he said, Musharraf must keep his promise to stem attacks in the disputed, predominantly Muslim Kashmir region. "He must stop the incursions across the line of control. He must do so. He said he would do so," the president said. "We and others are making it clear to him that he must live up to his word." Flanked by Powell and Rumsfeld at the polished Cabinet Room table, Bush said Rumsfeld will go to the region next week. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer (news - web sites) said Rumsfeld will visit both countries and unspecified other countries. "All these visits are part of the international community's ongoing diplomacy to work with India and Pakistan to reduce tensions in the area and convince both parties that war does not serve their interests," Fleischer said. With tensions skyrocketing, Bush responded to a report in USA Today that the government was making plans for the possible evacuation of 1,100 U.S. troops and up to 63,000 U.S citizens from both countries. He said Rumsfeld and Powell are "analyzing what it would take to protect American lives if need be." He did not elaborate. He also pledged to continue efforts to track down al-Qaida members in Pakistan. "We're doing everything we can to shore up our effort on the Pakistan-Afghan border," Bush said. "We're going to hunt them down." At the State Department, meanwhile, Powell was faced with a decision on whether to advise American diplomats and their dependents to leave India, two U.S. officials said. Citing rising tensions, an official told The Associated Press: "We try to be prudent. Anytime tensions rise we review our options." If Powell orders a voluntary departure from the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi and three consulates, U.S. diplomats and their dependents would be advised to consider leaving India on commercial airplanes or chartered planes at U.S. government expenses. There are several hundred U.S. Embassy employees and dependents in New Delhi, Calcutta, Mumbai and Chennai, and some 60,000 U.S. citizens in India. A tougher step, not entirely ruled out, is for Powell to order all but essential U.S. employees to depart. This was done in Pakistan after an attack last March on a church in Islamabad frequented by Westerners. This stripped the U.S. Embassy of all but a core contingent. On Friday, the State Department advised U.S. citizens in India they should consider departing. If Powell decides on a voluntary departure, another advisory would be issued telling U.S. citizens to consider doing what U.S. officials are being advised to do. Bush has made the region a top priority for his diplomats, Fleischer said, and is stressing to India and Pakistan "the importance of taking steps to reduce the tensions and avoid a war." Bush was satisfied with Musharraf's recent pledge to do more to halt terrorist operations, and "will continue to urge additional actions and ongoing actions by Pakistan, as well as by India, to reduce the tensions," Fleischer said. In response to the USA report, Fleischer pointed out that the United States routinely has a plan for spiriting Americans away from potential unrest, and "you can assume we have plans in place as well in that area of tension." Administration spokesmen made no pretense Wednesday that the two sides were backing away from their crisis, saying the situation could spiral out of control if "irresponsible elements" had their way. A State Department official, asking not to be identified, said the statement was directed in particular at Pakistani Islamic extremists. In the Indian capital, New Delhi, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said he had determined after meeting with leaders from both sides that war is not inevitable." India demanded that Islamabad stop Pakistani militants from penetrating into Indian territory, declaring that such action was vital for peace. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher issued a similar appeal. Musharraf said his country's military was "ready to face any challenge." The border region of Kashmir has been hotly contested since British India was partitioned in 1947 and Kashmir went to Hindu India despite its overwhelmingly Muslim populace. The current phase of the crisis began two weeks ago when suspected Islamic militants attacked an Indian army base in Kashmir and killed more than 30 people, including 10 children. India and Pakistan have fought three wars, but the stakes now are much higher because both sides have nuclear weapons. Pakistan is the smaller and weaker of the two South Asian neighbors. Some experts fear that Pakistan might consider nuclear weapons its only viable option if confronted by a massive Indian attack using conventional forces. "There is a danger that as tensions escalate the leaders could find themselves in a situation in which irresponsible elements can spark a conflict," Boucher said. story.news.yahoo.com