To: Thomas M. who wrote (14943 ) 5/30/2002 2:16:55 PM From: epsteinbd Respond to of 23908 OK, looks like I have to throw a word here. Since Chimnoy Roy didn't. He did write that, and he did so following the exchange we had, where, in two different posts, after "him" selling some usual hate against Bush and love of Mullahs. (I am not inventing, even though it is hard to believe, read those posts.) So, as I wanted to screen the guts of this newcomer, and I called him "Chimnoy boy" instead of Roy on two different posts, and writing that Mohammed (yes, the wierdo they call prophet), was a serial rapist of young girls he married, which I firmly believe he was, because you don't expect ten years old girls to go horizontal for that desert warrior. ( But if you do, you should stop reading here.) A good spirited poster asked him to write SI and tell them to remove his own post, for it will stay there forever like a Scarlett scar, but it was week end, and it took SI two days to do so. Meanwhile other posters took this "illuminating" post on other threads, and gave it, possibly, an endless life. Please not that I have nothing to complain about, not even the fact that I was "banned" for three days by SI, for, "Your posts about Mohammed being a serial rapist to antagonize Chimnoy Roy." But I do ignore to this day if I banned because I wrote that Mohammed in a serial rapist, or because I antogonized somebody ? A very cheap price, IMO. Ready to be charged again, anytime. Now had my antagonist apologized, or answered to that question in a proper manner, I would have refrained from the present post. But if you start insulting fair people, writing they are liars, then I must let you in the truth, however ugly it is.