SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (259840)5/31/2002 1:30:37 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Catastrophic intelligence Failure - Clinton's Bin Laden GATE
Accuracy in Media | September 24, 2001 | Cliff Kincaid - Reed Irvine
aim.org
CATASTROPHIC INTELLIGENCE FAILURE

In 1995, the CIA and the FBI learned that Osama bin Laden was planning to hijack U.S. airliners and use them as bombs to attack important targets in the U.S. This scheme was called Project Bojinka. It was discovered in the Philippines, where authorities arrested two of bin Laden's agents, Ramzi Yousef and Abdul Hakim Murad. They were involved in planting a bomb on a Philippine airliner. Project Bojinka, which Philip-pine authorities found outlined on Abdul Murad's laptop, called for planting bombs on eleven U.S. airliners and hijacking others and crashing them into targets like the CIA building.

The hijacking part of the plan got less attention than the planting of bombs. It required aviators like Japan's kamikaze pilots who were willing to commit suicide. Bin Laden had no such pilots in 1995, but he set out to train young fanatics willing to die for him to fly airliners. Abdul Murad, whose laptop had revealed the plan, admitted that he was being trained for a suicide mission. Bin Laden began training pilots in Afghanistan with the help of an Afghan pilot and a Pakistani general.

Project Bojinka was known to the CIA and the FBI. It was described in court documents in the trial in New York of Ramzi Yousef and Abdul Murad for their participation in the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. Since the CIA had been mentioned as one of the targets in Project Bojinka, it should have had an especially strong interest in any evidence that bin Laden was preparing to carry it out. The most obvious indicator, and one that should have been watched most carefully, was the recruitment of young, dedicated followers to learn to fly American airliners. That would require keeping a close watch on flight schools where that training is given.

Foreigners, including many from the Middle East, flock to flight schools in the U.S. Visas are given almost automatically to those who apply to these schools. It is especially easy for those with Saudi Arabian passports. At Huffman Aviation International in Venice, Florida, about 70 percent of the students are foreigners. That is one of the schools where Mohammed Atta, 33, who steered American Airlines flight 11 into the north WTC tower, and Marwan Yousef Alshehhi, who flew United Airlines flight 175 into the south tower were trained. Both had back-grounds that would have sounded an alarm had the CIA checked them.

A Huffman Aviation employee says that if the FBI had informed them that bin Laden had a plan to hijack our airliners and crash them into important buildings and had asked them to report any suspicious students, they would have cooperated. It was news to him that the FBI and CIA knew about this plan. It has been reported that a student who was training on a flight simulator at a Minnesota school wasn't interested in learning how to land a plane. If true, that would surely have been reported if the school had been contacted by the FBI.

Osama bin Laden apparently knew better than the FBI how lax our government was about checking out students who come here for flight training. He took full advantage of it. Now that we have paid a horrendous price for this intelligence failure, the FBI and the CIA are scurrying to learn more about young men from countries where bin Laden's Al Qaeda has support who have taken flight training in recent years. The Washington Post reports that at least 44 of those the FBI wants to question are pilots. As of Sept. 20, we had seen no reports in the papers that had identified more than three of the 19 dead hijackers as pilots. That means that bin Laden still has an ample supply of manpower to continue Project Bojinka. Louis Freeh bears a lot of the blame for this, but he has already resigned. George Tenet, who heads the CIA, should resign or be fired.

BIN LADEN GATE By Cliff Kincaid

Several Clinton administration top officials appeared on television to express their surprise and anger over the terrorist attacks on New York City and the Pentagon by agents of Osama bin Laden. But just two years ago, they were accepting help from bin Laden in NATO's war on Yugoslavia. They were assisting the Kosovo Liberation Army which bin Laden was assisting with fighters trained in his camps in Afghanistan.

A story by Jerry Seper in the Washington Times on May 4, 1999, reported, "Some members of the Kosovo Liberation Army, which has financed its war effort through the sale of heroin, were trained in terrorist camps run by international fugitive Osama bin Laden—who is wanted in the 1998 bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa that killed 224 persons, including 12 Americans." Seper said that newly obtained intelligence reports showed that the KLA had enlisted Islamic terrorists in its conflict with Serbia and that bin Laden's organization, known as al-Qaeda, had both trained and financially supported the KLA, which had been labeled a terrorist group by a Clinton State Department official.

Despite that, General Wesley Clark, who was NATO's supreme commander during the war in Kosovo, said in a September 14th column in the Washington Post that the U.S. must use decisive force against international terrorism. He had worked closely with the KLA during the war, implementing a Clinton policy that ignored more serious human rights problems in other parts of the world. The Clinton administration, for example, remained largely indifferent to the persecution of Christians in Sudan, where an Islamic regime has killed almost 2 million people and was, for a time, Osama bin Laden's home.

The CIA Connection

Bin Laden, a Saudi by birth, was supported by the CIA when he was battling the Soviet occupiers of Afghanistan during the 1980s. A former U.S. Army sergeant, Egyptian-born Ali Mohamed, told a New York court that after he had left the army in 1989, he had helped train members of bin Laden's terrorist organization, al Qaeda. Last year, he admitted his involvement in the bombing of the embassies in Africa ordered by bin Laden.

Dollars for Terror, a book by Swiss television journalist Richard Labeviere, claims that Mohamed trained Islamic militants in several camps in the New York area and suggests that he was an active U.S. agent. Labeviere, who conducted a four-year investigation and has written extensively on Arab and African affairs, has concluded that the international Islamic networks linked to bin Laden have been nurtured and encouraged by elements of the U.S. intelligence community, especially during the Clinton years. He says the international Islamic network was protected because it was designed to serve U.S. foreign policy and military interests.

Labeviere claims that the CIA blocked the FBI from cracking down on these terrorist networks. "Bin-Ladengate is unfolding, and there is no escape," he says. "If it blows up one day, this scandal will reveal exactly how the various American intelligence agencies were involved in the process that led to the Nairobi [Kenya] and Dar es Salaam [Tanzania] bombings." Labeviere claims that Clinton and his top aides did not anticipate that this radical Islamic network would turn against the United States. But even when it did, they figured the U.S. would gain more from it in the long run.

Labeviere argues that the Clinton administration viewed the bin Laden network and the radical Taliban regime in Afghan-istan as a bulwark against Russian, Iranian and even Chinese influence in Asia. He quotes a former CIA analyst as saying, "The policy of guiding the evolution of Islam and of helping them against our adversaries worked marvelously well in Afghanistan against the Red Army. The same doctrines can still be used to destabilize what remains of Russian power, and especially to counter the Chinese influence in Central Asia." It was believed that Sunni Islam could be used to undermine Russia in Chechnya and China in southern Xingjiang.

It was also present in all the Muslim republics of the former Soviet Union. Labeviere says, "with the active support of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other oil monarchies and with the benevolence of the American [intelligence] services engaged in these areas, we can expect a ‘Talibanization' of Central Asia, particularly in Chechnya." Labeviere says that between 1994 and 1997, "Bill Clinton was happy to allow Pakistan and Saudi Arabia to support the Taliban, seeing them as a useful counterbalance to Iran's influence…" [Iran's Muslims are Shiites].

On January 13, 2000, a Los Angeles Times article headlined, "Some See U.S. as Terrorists' Next Big Target," quoted Labeviere as saying, "For America, the bill is now coming due." The bill for "Bin Ladengate" was paid in blood on September 11, 2001. Labeviere's book has received favorable reviews in Europe. But it has been ignored by the U.S. press except for the Los Angeles Times.

The Labeviere analysis, as shocking as it appears, could also explain why the perpetrators of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon operated freely in the U.S., without interference from law enforcement or intelligence agencies. Three weeks before the attacks, the CIA and FBI reportedly knew that two of the hijackers, including one with a link to the bombing of the U.S. destroyer Cole last October, were in the U.S. But they were not apprehended.

This shocked the Washington Post. It said, "The scattered details that have emerged about the plot put this failure in stark relief: More than 50 people were likely involved, Justice Department officials have said, and the plot required extensive communications and planning to pull off. The group's size — not to mention the complexity of its endeavor — should have offered many opportunities for intelligence infiltration. Yet the conspirators proceeded unmolested. What is striking is how safe these people apparently felt, how unthreatened by law enforcement. Some of the terrorists were here for long periods. They left and entered the country unimpeded. Some were reportedly on the so-called ‘watch list,' a government catalogue of people who ostensibly are not permitted to enter the country. Yet this apparently caused them no problems."

Friends in High Places

Labeviere claims that Saudi Arabia is bankrolling bin Laden's networks as a way to further its own brand of Sunni Islam. This runs counter to the story that bin Laden, whose family runs the largest construction firm in Saudi Arabia, is a disowned renegade. Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates are the only countries that recognize the Taliban regime. On Octo-ber 29, 1999, Jack Kelley reported in USA Today that "prominent businessmen in Saudi Arabia continue to transfer tens of million of dollars to bank accounts linked to Osama Bin Laden." Citing senior U.S. intelligence officials and a Saudi government document, Kelley said the money transfers had begun five years earlier. Kelley said one of the businessmen under investigation, Mohammad Hussein al-Amoudi, runs the largest bank in Saudi Arabia, as well as the Capitol Trust Bank in New York. Vernon Jordan, one of Bill Clinton's close friends, is his lawyer.

In August 1998, the situation seemed to change when bin Laden was blamed for the destruction of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. He was placed on the FBI's Most Wanted List and a reward was offered for his capture. But Labeviere says the State Department never exerted any real pressure on the Taliban to apprehend him. The U.S. attacks on Afghanistan and Sudan as retaliation for the embassy bombings diverted attention from the Lewinsky scandal. At first, some senators questioned the timing of the attacks, and there was talk of a "Wag-the-Dog" scenario. By creating the appearance that he was acting presidential and rallying support under the banner "America Strikes Back," Clinton weathered the storm. The A.P. subsequently reported that the Clinton administration had "specific intelligence"about bin Laden's whereabouts but had decided not to try to capture or kill him.

Peter M. Leitner, a senior strategic trade adviser at the Defense Department, said, "The real issue in this tragedy is how were these people able to plan and coordinate such a strike over a period of months without the NSA intercepting their signals?" Leitner, who reviews commercial license applications for exports of sophisticated military-related technology, said, "The technology that would allow these terrorists to mask their communications was given away, hand over fist, by the Clinton administration." In an interview with Paul Sperry of WorldNetDaily, Leitner said the previous administration ap-proved the shipment of high-tech military-related telecommunications equipment to Syria. "They provide infrastructure to bastards like bin Laden," he said. "They provide backup and support and communications abilities to these terrorist cells." Leitner is now having the same problem with the Bush administration.

Damage Control

President Bush has fingered bin Laden as a prime suspect but also says countries which harbor terrorists will be held accountable. The Clinton administration identified seven state sponsors of terrorism—Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Cuba, North Korea, and Sudan—but bin Laden is reported to have thousands of followers and terrorist cells in 50-60 countries, including the U.S. The Washington Post published a long article about bin Laden's worldwide activities, noting his presence in places like NATO- and U.N.-occupied Bosnia and Kosovo, but failed to explain how this occurred under the watchful eye of the Clinton administration.

Bob Woodward of the Post co-authored a September 14 front-page article insisting that the CIA has been authorized since 1998 to use covert means to disrupt bin Laden's operations under a presidential directive signed by Clinton. This article had the earmarks of a damage control operation on the part of the U.S. officials who worked with bin Laden's followers in the Balkans and now realize that their efforts have backfired. CBS News correspondent Lesley Stahl aired a similar report on September 16, adding the tantalizing tidbit that Clinton may have authorized bin Laden's apprehension or assassination. Virtually admitting she had been leaked this information by former Clinton officials, Stahl said "there are people in Washington who want the American people to know they have not been asleep at the wheel in the war on terrorism and, even though there may have been some failures, they have been trying."

The Clinton administration's soft-on-terrorism policy actually began when it blamed the 1993 World Trade Center bombing on individual terrorists, not on any state. Evidence to the contrary has been assembled in the important book, Study of Revenge, by Laurie Mylroie, that the mastermind, Ramzi Yousef, was in fact an Iraqi agent. The book was published by American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Press at a time when Vice President Dick Cheney was vice-chairman of the AEI board of trustees.

James Woolsey, who served as a CIA director under Clinton, has also become an advocate of the view that Iraq was behind the first World Trade Center bombing. Woolsey notes that James Fox, the FBI's chief investigator into the 1993 bombing until his replacement in 1994, believed in the Iraqi connection. "And indeed," Woolsey adds, "ever since Fox's ouster, federal prosecutors and the White House have hewed to the line that most terrorist attacks on the United States are either the products of ‘loose networks' of folks who just somehow come together or are masterminded by the mysterious and unaccountable bin Laden. Explicit state sponsorship, especially by Iraq, has not been on the agenda."

Woolsey says intelligence and law enforcement officials would be well-advised to consider the possibility that the recent attacks, "whether perpetrated by bin Laden and his associates or by others—were sponsored, supported, and perhaps even ordered by Saddam Hussein." However, on NBC's Meet the Press on September 16, just five days after the new attacks when investigations were still presumably underway, Cheney seemed to arbitrarily rule out an Iraqi role.

Officially, the Clinton administration opposed terrorism and funded reports on the problem. A so-called National Commission on Terrorism, a bipartisan group headed by Paul Bremer of Kissinger Associates, released its report on June 5, 2000. The commission wanted more taxpayer dollars spent on fighting terrorism, and it said that the CIA and the FBI needed more power. Some of the media argued that giving the government more power would provoke the opposition of civil libertarians.

But the real story was why the commission failed to subject the Clinton administration's policy on terrorism to serious scrutiny. The commission was mildly critical of the administration's handling of Iran and Libya, but it failed to explain the adoption of a policy of appeasement of Libya in the 1988 Pan Am 103 bombing that killed 270 people, including 189 Americans. The Bremer report simply suggested that "prosecuting and punishing low- level operatives for an act almost certainly directed by Gadhafi is a hollow victory, particularly if the trial results in his implicit exoneration."

Documents showed that the Clinton administration and U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan, in preparation for a trial of the two Libyans in the case, made a deal that let Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi off the hook for his role in the mass murder. In the documents outlining the deal, which included handing over the two defendants, Gadhafi received a get-out-of-jail-free card through a promise that the trial would not "undermine" the Libyan regime. This was widely viewed as a guarantee not to charge Gadhafi or his top aides in the terrorist incident. The documents had been kept secret for more than a year because the State Department had classified them. Gadhafi, of course, had them all along. He confirmed the existence of the deal in an interview with British Sky TV. The trial before a Scottish judge resulted in the conviction of a Libyan intelligence official.

The commission didn't explain why the Clinton administration failed to pursue a foreign connection to the Oklahoma City bombing. Convicted bomber Terry Nichols had connections to the Philippines, where Muslim terrorists are very active. Middle East analyst Laurie Mylroie believes the government of Iraq was behind the Oklahoma City bombing, as well as the first terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. Stephen Jones, lawyer for the other convicted bomber, Timothy McVeigh, also believes Iraq was ultimately behind the plot.

The Attack on the USS Cole

The establishment media helped the Clinton administration put on a good face in the aftermath of the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen in October 2000. 60 Minutes aired an interview with Clinton's "terrorism czar" Richard Clarke, who was responsible for counter-terrorism at the National Security Council. He told Lesley Stahl that the U.S. was trying to determine who staged that attack, and suggested it may have been committed by Osama bin Laden. He also warned that terrorists have infiltrated the U.S. and that it was just a matter of time before American territory was the site of a nuclear, biological or chemical attack. If this was true, it was because Clinton had allowed such a situation to develop. But that's not the conclusion Stahl came to. Bin Laden took credit for the attack on the Cole but no retribution was ever exacted for that. Mylroie says Iraq probably assisted in this attack.

The Clinton administration's handling of the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia became a subject of some controversy in the media. Bin Laden was suspected of bankrolling this terrorist incident, which left 19 American servicemen dead and scores injured, and which was reportedly carried out with Iranian government support. The evidence connecting Iran to the plot was the subject of a report by John McWethy of ABC World News Tonight, who cited overwhelming evidence of Iranian involvement. He said the evidence included U.S. intercepts of Iranian communications and admissions of Iranian involvement by the bombers themselves. McWethy said the bombers were recruited by Iran during a trip to an Islamic meeting in Syria, took religious training in Iran, and terrorist training in Lebanon. Kenneth R. Timmerman has also cited evidence of an Iranian link to the Khobar Towers bombing. However, Saudi Arabia was reluctant to provide evidence on the Iranian role, and the Clinton administration put the blame on Osama bin Laden. Still, no retaliation was ordered. The August 2, 1996 USA Today identified a network of 11 different terrorist-training facilities in Iran, citing classified U.S. intelligence documents. Yet no U.S. action was ever been taken by Clinton against those camps.

The Bush Response

It appears that much of the world wants the U.S. to go after bin Laden in Afghanistan. Iran has even condemned the most recent attacks on America, but that does not mean that the regime has turned over a new leaf. Most commentators fail to point out that Iran has been at war with the extremist Taliban.

NATO, having assisted Clinton and the Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo, says it, too, wants to help us fight terrorism. The United Nations, a host to all of the terrorist regimes in the world except the Taliban, has condemned the terrorist attacks. Russia, concerned about the bin Laden networks in Chechnya, is on our side. China abstained last December when the U.N. voted to condemn the Taliban's support of terrorism and demand the extradition of bin Laden. On Sept. 11, the day of the attacks, it signed an economic deal with the Taliban.

Unless we are prudent, the war President Bush has declared on terrorism, for which Congress has already appropriated $40 billion, could cost more lives and money than the attacks. The Soviet Union, bordering on Afghanistan, could not win a ground war there. That may not be a feasible option for the U.S. If we employ weapons of mass destruction to kill tens of thousands of innocent noncombatants, we risk making enemies of all the Muslims throughout the world and shattering the nearly universal support we now enjoy. The result could be an increase in terrorist acts, playing into Osama bin Laden's hands.

If the Taliban refuse to give him up, we would be justified in using our air power and missiles to deliver a blow sufficiently punishing to weaken them and bin Laden very seriously. We could increase the reward for delivering him into our hands a 100 or even 200 times the $5 million we are now offering. We could mobilize international support for the Northern Alliance, the Taliban's domestic foes, and launch a psychological warfare campaign, saturating Afghanistan with broadcasts designed to turn people against the Taliban.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (259840)5/31/2002 1:31:57 AM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 769667
 
Resentful west spurned Sudan's key terror files (Gobs of info offered on Terrorists)
The Observer International | September 30, 2001
observer.co.uk

Security chiefs on both sides of the Atlantic repeatedly turned down the chance to acquire a vast intelligence database on Osama bin Laden and more than 200 leading members of his al-Qaeda terrorist network in the years leading up to the 11 September attacks, an Observer investigation has revealed.
They were offered thick files, with photographs and detailed biographies of many of his principal cadres, and vital information about al-Qaeda's financial interests in many parts of the globe.

On two separate occasions, they were given an opportunity to extradite or interview key bin Laden operatives who had been arrested in Africa because they appeared to be planning terrorist atrocities.

None of the offers, made regularly from the start of 1995, was taken up. One senior CIA source admitted last night: 'This represents the worst single intelligence failure in this whole terrible business. It is the key to the whole thing right now. It is reasonable to say that had we had this data we may have had a better chance of preventing the attacks.'

He said the blame for the failure lay in the 'irrational hatred' the Clinton administration felt for the source of the proffered intelligence - Sudan, where bin Laden and his leading followers were based from 1992-96. He added that after a slow thaw in relations which began last year, it was only now that the Sudanese information was being properly examined for the first time.

Last weekend, a key meeting took place in London between Walter Kansteiner, the US Assistant Secretary of State for Africa, FBI and CIA representatives, and Yahia Hussien Baviker, the Sudanese intelligence deputy chief. However, although the intelligence channel between Sudan and the United States is now open, and the last UN sanctions against the African state have been removed, The Observer has evidence that a separate offer made by Sudanese agents in Britain to share intelligence with MI6 has been rejected. This follows four years of similar rebuffs.

'If someone from MI6 comes to us and declares himself, the next day he can be in Khartoum,' said a Sudanese government source. 'We have been saying this for years.'

Bin Laden and his cadres came to Sudan in 1992 because at that time it was one of the few Islamic countries where they did not need visas. He used his time there to build a lucrative web of legitimate businesses, and to seed a far-flung financial network - much of which was monitored by the Sudanese.

They also kept his followers under close surveillance. One US source who has seen the files on bin Laden's men in Khartoum said some were 'an inch and a half thick'.

They included photographs, and information on their families, backgrounds and contacts. Most were 'Afghan Arabs', Saudis, Yemenis and Egyptians who had fought with bin Laden against the Soviets in Afghanistan.

'We know them in detail,' said one Sudanese source. 'We know their leaders, how they implement their policies, how they plan for the future. We have tried to feed this information to American and British intelligence so they can learn how this thing can be tackled.'

In 1996, following intense pressure from Saudi Arabia and the US, Sudan agreed to expel bin Laden and up to 300 of his associates. Sudanese intelligence believed this to be a great mistake.

'There we could keep track of him, read his mail,' the source went on. 'Once we kicked him out and he went to ground in Afghanistan, he couldn't be tracked anywhere.'

The Observer has obtained a copy of a personal memo sent from Sudan to Louis Freeh, former director of the FBI, after the murderous 1998 attacks on American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. It announces the arrest of two named bin Laden operatives held the day after the bombings after they crossed the Sudanese border from Kenya. They had cited the manager of a Khartoum leather factory owned by bin Laden as a reference for their visas, and were held after they tried to rent a flat overlooking in the US embassy in Khartoum, where they were thought to be planning an attack.

US sources have confirmed that the FBI wished to arrange their immediate extradition. However, Clinton's Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, forbade it. She had classed Sudan as a 'terrorist state,' and three days later US missiles blasted the al-Shifa medicine factory in Khartoum.

The US wrongly claimed it was owned by bin Laden and making chemical weapons. In fact, it supplied 60 per cent of Sudan's medicines, and had contracts to make vaccines with the UN.

Even then, Sudan held the suspects for a further three weeks, hoping the US would both perform their extradition and take up the offer to examine their bin Laden database. Finally, the two men were deported to Pakistan. Their present whereabouts are unknown.

Last year the CIA and FBI, following four years of Sudanese entreaties, sent a joint investigative team to establish whether Sudan was in fact a sponsor of terrorism. Last May, it gave Sudan a clean bill of health. However, even then, it made no effort to examine the voluminous files on bin Laden.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (259840)5/31/2002 1:36:46 AM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 769667
 
The damage Clinton did
Andrew Sullivan:
sunday-times.co.uk

...The September 11 massacre resulted from a fantastic failure on the part of the United States government to protect its citizens from an act of war. This failure is now staring us in the face and, if the errors are to be rectified, it is essential to acknowledge what went wrong.

Two questions come to mind: how was it that the Osama Bin Laden network, known for more than a decade, was still at large and dangerous enough this autumn to inflict such a deadly blow? Who was responsible in the government for such a failure of intelligence, foreign policy and national security? These questions have not been asked directly, for good reasons.

There is a need to avoid recriminations at a time of national crisis. But at the same time, the American lack of preparedness that Tuesday is already slowing the capacity to bring Bin Laden to justice by constricting military and diplomatic options. And with a president just a few months in office, criticism need not extend to the young administration that largely inherited this tattered security apparatus.

Whatever failures of intelligence, security or diplomacy exist, they have roots far deeper than the first nine months of this year. When national disasters of unpreparedness have occurred in other countries...ministers responsible have resigned. Taking responsibility for mistakes in the past is part of the effort not to repeat them. So why have heads not rolled?

The most plausible answer is that nobody has been fired because this attack was so novel and impossible to predict that nothing in America's security apparatus could have prevented it. The only problem with this argument is that it is patently untrue. Throughout the Clinton years, this kind of attack was not only predictable but predicted. Not only had Bin Laden already attacked American embassies and warships, he had done so repeatedly and been completely frank about his war. He had even attempted to destroy the World Trade Center in 1993. Same guy, same building. ...

The decision to get down and dirty with the terrorists, to take their threat seriously and counter them aggressively, was simply never taken. Many bear the blame for this: Warren Christopher, the clueless, stately former secretary of state; Anthony Lake, the tortured intellectual at the National Security Council; General Colin Powell, whose decision to use Delta Force units in Somalia so badly backfired; but, above all, former president Bill Clinton, whose inattention to military and security matters now seems part of the reason why America was so vulnerable to slaughter.

Klein cites this devastating quote from a senior Clinton official: "Clinton spent less concentrated attention on national defence than any other president in recent memory. He could learn an issue very quickly, but he wasn't very interested in getting his hands dirty with detail work. His style was procrastination, seeing where everyone was, before taking action. This was truer in his first term than in the second, but even when he began to pay attention he was constrained by public opinion and his own unwillingness to take risks."It is hard to come up with a more damning description of negligence than that.

Clinton even got a second chance. In 1998, after Bin Laden struck again at US embassies in Africa, the president was put on notice that the threat was deadly. He responded with a couple of missile strikes against Afghanistan and Sudan, some of which missed their targets and none of which seriously impacted on Osama Bin Laden...

If the security manager of a nuclear power plant presides over a massive external attack on it, then it's only right that he should be held responsible, in part, for what happened. More than 6,000 families are now living with the deadly consequences of the negligence of the government of the United States. There is no greater duty for such a government than the maintenance of national security, and the protection of its own citizens.

When a senior Clinton official can say of his own leader that he "spent less concentrated attention on national defence than any other president in recent memory", and when this administration is followed by the most grievous breach of domestic security in American history, it is not unreasonable to demand some accounting...

We thought for a long time that the Clinton years would be seen, in retrospect, as a mixed blessing. He was sleazy and unprincipled, we surmised, but he was also competent, he led an economic recovery, and he conducted a foreign policy of multilateral distinction.

But the further we get away from the Clinton years, the more damning they seem. The narcissistic, feckless, escapist culture of an America absent without leave in the world was fomented from the top. The boom at the end of the decade turned out to include a dangerous bubble that the administration did little to prevent.

The "peace-making" in the Middle East and Ireland merely intensified the conflicts. The sex and money scandals were not just debilitating in themselves - they meant that even the minimal attention that the Clinton presidency paid to strategic military and intelligence work was skimped on.

We were warned. But we were coasting. And the main person primarily entrusted with correcting that delusion, with ensuring America's national security - the president - was part of the problem.

Through the dust clouds of September 11, and during the difficult task ahead, one person hovers over the wreckage - and that is Bill Clinton. His legacy gets darker with each passing day.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (259840)5/31/2002 1:40:11 AM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 769667
 
Borderless Network of Terror
Bin Laden Followers Reach Across Globe
washingtonpost.com

By Doug Struck, Howard Schneider, Karl Vick and Peter Baker
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, September 23, 2001; Page A01

MANILA -- Abdul Hakim Murad washed his hands, and broke a basic rule of bombmaking.

When the water mixed with chemical residue in the kitchen sink of unit 603 in the Dona Josefa Apartments here in 1995, it set off an eruption that would reveal the inner workings of a clandestine terrorist cell allied with Osama bin Laden.

It also revealed a plan that gave a chilling preview of the attack in New York and Washington on Sept. 11.

Arrested and tortured by Philippine intelligence agents, Murad told the story of "Bojinka" -- "loud bang" -- the code name bin Laden operatives had given to an audacious plan to bomb 11 U.S. airliners simultaneously and fly an airplane into the CIA headquarters in Langley, Va. -- all after attempting to assassinate Pope John Paul II.

The plot in the Philippines, which was recounted to U.S. investigators at the time, appears to be a model of the methods, aims and structure of the network that bin Laden's followers have assembled in dozens of countries around the world. Members of this diffuse confederation of radical Islamists, drawing inspiration, funding and training from bin Laden's al Qaeda group, have provided the foot soldiers -- and some commanders for his core organization -- for attacks on U.S. citizens.

These cells, the groups that host them and any country that allows them to operate within its borders are now the declared enemies in the U.S. war on terrorism. An examination of operations linked to bin Laden's network in five countries -- the Philippines, Jordan, Uzbekistan, Yemen and Egypt -- shows how difficult the fight will be.

Despite common organizational patterns and ideology, the terrorists fighting for bin Laden's cause come from diverse locations and backgrounds. Some have long ties to bin Laden and al Qaeda. Others have acted nearly autonomously, undetected by authorities until the last moment before an attack, or after one had occurred.

The Philippines plot of 1995 had many hallmarks of an operation mounted by terrorists tied to al Qaeda, which means "the base." According to Philippine intelligence reports obtained by The Washington Post, the attempt to bomb the airliners was meticulously planned and well financed, and involved preparations in countries across the globe, including the United States.

Intelligence records indicate the precise flights that were to be targeted: United 808, Delta 59, Northwest 6, and others. The records included calculations to determine when to set the bomb's timer on each flight. They also included the names of dozens of associates, and photos of some; a record of five-star hotels; and dealings with a trading corporation in London, a meat market owner in Malaysia and an Islamic center in Tucson, Ariz.

The intelligence records list flying schools in San Antonio, Schenectady, N.Y., and New Bern, N.C., where Murad trained as a commercial pilot. They describe how money moved through an Abu Dhabi banking firm. Bar hostesses were bribed with gifts and holiday trips to open bank accounts in which to stash associates' funds.

The plotters also included in their plans the motives for the mission, in a manifesto recovered by investigators: "The U.S. government gives military aircraft to the Jewish state so the Jews can continue fighting and killing. All of this is a result of the U.S. government's financial and military support of the Jewish state. All people who support the U.S. government are our target."

Bin Laden's links to the Philippines were established early in the 1990s. In 1991, Abdurajak Janjalani, who had fought with bin Laden in Afghanistan, returned to the Philippines and founded Abu Sayyaf -- "father of the sword" -- which announced itself by killing two American evangelists in 1991 in a grenade blast. Officials believe Janjalani got money from an Islamic foundation run by bin Laden's brother-in-law, Mohammad Jamal Khalifa, who lived in the Philippines with a Filipino wife.

When Pope John Paul II announced he would visit the Philippines in 1995, authorities worried about possible attacks by Abu Sayyaf. But the real threat turned out to be even graver.

On Jan. 6, one week before the pope's visit, Police Station 9 in Manila noticed a fire alarm was activated in an apartment building not far from the pontiff's expected route. At first the cause appeared to be a simple cooking fire. But Capt. Aida Fariscal, the night commander, went there to see for herself. "I had a sixth sense," she said.

As she was looking around, Murad, a 26-year-old Pakistani who called himself Saeed Ahmed, returned. He panicked, and tried to run. His shoe caught on the roots of a potted plant, and Fariscal commandeered a taxi and two bystanders to haul him back to the station. "He offered me a lot of money to get him out of this mess," said Fariscal. When she and others returned to the apartment, they found a bomb factory, stocked with beakers, gallons of sulfuric acid and nitric acid, glycerin, large cooking kettles, filters, funnels and fuses.

Slowly, pieces of disparate puzzles came together. Investigators found Casio watches in the apartment that matched a timing device used to detonate a small chemical bomb a month earlier on a Philippine Airlines flight to Tokyo, killing a Japanese businessman. They found a stack of passports -- Norwegian, Afghan, Saudi, Pakistani -- for the three men in the apartment.

Murad would not talk. Handed over to intelligence agents, he taunted them. That didn't last.

"For weeks, agents hit him with a chair and a long piece of wood, forced water into his mouth, and crushed lighted cigarettes into his private parts," wrote journalists Marites Vitug and Glenda Gloria in "Under the Crescent Moon," an acclaimed book on Abu Sayyaf. "His ribs were almost totally broken and his captors were surprised he survived."

An investigator intimately knowledgeable of the investigation confirmed the torture, but gloated that it was Murad's fears of Jews that finally broke him. "We impersonated the Mossad," he said, referring to the Israeli intelligence service. "He thought we were going to take him to Israel."

Murad told all. One of his two roommates in Apt. 603 was a young Kuwaiti chemical engineer named Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, who had helped plan the 1993 explosions at the World Trade Center, he said. They were in Manila to make a bomb to kill the pope. One of them would hide it under a priest's robes, and try to get close enough to kiss the pontiff as the bomb went off.

The next part of the plan was to bomb American airliners. The device on the Philippine airliner was a dry run, he said. Murad had earned a commercial pilot's license, and told investigators he had planned to fly a plane into the CIA headquarters.

Murad was turned over to the Americans. Yousef, who had calmly walked away from the Manila apartment when the firemen arrived, was found a month later in Pakistan. A third man at the Manila apartment, Wali Khan Amin Shah, was nabbed in Malaysia. All three were convicted by a New York court in 1997 of involvement in the bomb plot.

But the scheme apparently lived on, officials here say. "They didn't give up the objective," said former Gen. Renado S. De Villa, who was head of the security effort for the pope's visit. "Murad clearly indicated it was a large-scale operation. They were targeting the U.S. And they had a worldwide network. It was very clear they continued to work on that plan until someone gave the signal to go."

Watching the attacks in New York and Washington unfold on television earlier this month, an investigator here gasped, "It's Bojinka." He said later: "We told the Americans everything about Bojinka. Why didn't they pay attention?"

Robert Heafner, the FBI chief in Manila at the time, who is now retired here, said the information was heeded. "I believe everything was done that could have been done," he said.

Abu Sayyaf still thrives in the Philippines, and could be a target in the U.S. war on terrorism. The group has grabbed headlines with its kidnapping schemes that have netted an estimated $25 million in ransoms. The group has bought high-powered speedboats and armaments, and has grown to about 1,200 soldiers by paying for recruits in the poor, remote islands where it operates. The group also holds two American missionaries, Martin and Gracia Burnham. A third American captive, Guillermo Sobero, could have been killed.

Observers here dismiss Abu Sayyaf as a gang of bandits with no current links to bin Laden. "They are now just a kidnap-for-ransom group, trying to use religion to justify their action," said Brig. Gen. Edilberto Adan, chief spokesman for the Philippine Armed Forces.

But the jitters of a wider war linger. Immigration authorities say four of the Sept. 11 hijackers may have passed through the Philippines several times since 1999. Sen. Rodolfo Biazon insists there is intelligence that 50 Abu Sayyaf were training in Afghanistan this year, though senior intelligence chiefs discount that report.

"We've been dealing with this problem for 10 years," said De Villa, still a top adviser to the president. "You're about to find that this is going to be a long haul."

Amman, Jordan

By the early 1990s, Raed Hijazi had found a mission.

Born and educated in California, Hijazi had been radicalized through college contacts he met at the Islamic Assistance Organization in Sacramento. He concluded that the country of his birth was the enemy of Islam. Violence was the means to confront it.

Hijazi traveled to Afghanistan, where he trained at bases run by al Qaeda. From there, he easily traversed continents with his U.S. passport. He worked as a cab driver in Boston, where he allegedly knew Nabil Al-Marabh, who was detained in Chicago last Wednesday in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks. He came to Amman, where he assembled weapons, chemicals and other supplies from Syria, Europe and elsewhere.

Here, according to prosecutors, Hijazi helped organize what was intended as a spectacular disruption of Jan. 1, 2000, celebrations: deadly attacks on Western tourists and Israelis across Jordan.

Today, Hijazi is in a Jordanian prison. Of 27 accomplices arrested in the scheme, five received death sentences, 16 are imprisonned and six were acquitted. Hijazi is currently on trial, and during proceedings earlier this month quietly recited from the Koran while held inside a black cage. His lawyer maintains he was tortured in prison, and that he is innocent. Hijazi also faces a possible death sentence.

Hijazi's alleged role in the millennium plot demonstrates the entrepreneurial side of bin Laden's network, Jordanian officials say. In this case as in others, they say, a loose-knit local structure was drawn together for a precise mission at a precise time with cash, planning, and encouragement from al Qaeda.

Groups linked to al Qaeda were first detected in Jordan nearly a decade earlier, in a series of modest attacks. Small explosive charges were detonated in parking lots, injuring no one. Theaters showing Western films, deemed "pornographic," were attacked. So were liquor stores, as was the American School on the airport road.

Membership in these groups included some of the 500 Jordanians who had volunteered to fight in Afghanistan as part of a CIA-supported war against an invading army from the Soviet Union. Returning after years of "jihad," or holy war, these "Afghan Arabs" didn't fit with Jordan's increasingly Westernized ways. They particularly came to resent the country's peace treaty with Israel and its ties to the United States.

"They found difficulty being part of the society," said a Jordanian official. "They considered that this society and this government was not good Islam, was not ruled by religion. Bars serving alcohol. Swimming pools. Discos."

They formed groups under names such as Mohammed's Army, Challenge and Reform, or the Group of Mohammed Maqdissi, while maintaining contact with bin Laden and his deputies. Jordanian intelligence officials saw a common pattern: Organizations devised localized schemes, then reported to designated deputies either in Afghanistan or Western capitals such as London.

Sometimes the connection to bin Laden was peripheral. Jordanian authorities claim that money and guidance for the Challenge and Reform group came from a London-based man, Omar Abu Omar, who they say largely operates on his own, even though he has ties to bin Laden.

For the millennium plot, however, they went straight to the source.

Beginning in 1996, Hijazi and a man named Khadar Abu Hoshar, a veteran of the Afghan wars, contacted one of bin Laden's chief operatives, Gaza-born Abu Zubaida. Arrangements were made for Hijazi and others to travel to Afghanistan in mid-1999 for final preparations.

There, Jordanians allege, both Zubaida and Khalil Deek, also an American citizen, reviewed the plan and the targets: a Radisson hotel fully booked for millennium celebrations, Israeli border posts, Mount Nebo, where Moses is thought to have viewed the Holy Land, and other spots.

It was one of three known operations set for New Year's Eve, including a plan to bomb Los Angeles International Airport that failed when a customs official at the Canadian border discovered bomb materials in the trunk of a car driven by an accused Algerian terrorist, Ahmed Ressam.

Jordanian officials broke up the plot through a combination of infiltration, electronic surveillance and counterintelligence. Although they dismantled the cell, they are unsure if remnants remain. Last week, authorities detained Mohammed Maqdissi, convicted of organizing a terrorist group in 1996 but pardoned in 1999, apparently seeking information about the Sept. 11 attacks.

In the end, proving complicity in individual crimes has been easier than undoing the network, or even demonstrating its reach. The Jordanian military tribunal that handed down guilty verdicts on some charges in the millennium case acquitted all of the defendants of charges that they were associated with al Qaeda.

Tashkent, Uzbekistan

In the two years since the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) introduced itself with bombings in this Central Asian capital, its heritage has been traced along the bloodlines of other groups born in Afghanistan.

One of its leaders, Juma Namangani, was a disillusioned Soviet paratrooper who embraced radical Islam on his return home to Uzbekistan, and eventually received training in Afghanistan from Tajik opposition and Pakistani and Saudi intelligence officials, according to a Russian military newspaper. The other leader, Tahir Yuldash, was a young activist in the same town in Uzbekistan who also wound up in Afghanistan, where he got to know bin Laden.

The IMU emerged from the guerrilla movement that challenged the government in Tajikistan during its 1992-97 civil war. Its goals are narrower and more nationalistic than those of bin Laden's borderless al Qaeda. It aims to topple President Islam Karimov and carve out an Islamic state in the Ferghana Valley, a fertile region that includes Uzbek, Tajik and Kyrgyz territory.

Although the Bush administration has identified the IMU as part of bin Laden's network, its links to al Qaeda are fuzzy. It enjoys a haven in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, and is said to receive funding from bin Laden. With camps in Tajikistan and an ability to launch raids into Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, U.S. analysts worry that one day it could strike near the oil fields of the nearby Caspian region.

Meanwhile, Karimov's repression of political opponents and Muslim activists may only be fueling its growth. Men wearing beards and women wearing scarves are often harassed and thousands of political opponents have been jailed. Some accused of radical ties have been raped and even beaten to death in detention, their bodies sent home with crushed skulls and no fingernails, according to human rights groups. Karimov has also alienated his neighbors by planting land mines along the borders with Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

The Uzbek guerrillas did not return to fight on their home turf this summer. Analysts say the Taliban leadership, faring poorly against anti-Taliban rebels, pressed its resident foreign allies into fighting in Afghanistan.

But now the IMU's 2,000 or so fighters may be on the move. According to the anti-Taliban group, Uzbek fighters were pulled back from the front lines about a week ago, and Russian border guards based in Tajikistan reported seeing concentrations of Uzbek militants on the other side of the border in recent days.

Aden, Yemen

In the days after a suicide bomb tore open the USS Cole as it paused for fuel in the humid Yemeni port of Aden -- killing 17 sailors and two zealots aboard an explosive-laden skiff -- anyone with the bushy whiskers favored by conservative Muslims was liable to be hauled in and asked hard questions.

In the context of the Koran, a full, untrimmed beard bespoke piety. But a different context had taken hold in Yemen during the latter half of the 1990s. Islam had become mixed with war. Militancy had bled into terrorism. And facial hair had grown suspicious enough that operatives of al Qaeda were instructed to shave before undertaking a mission.

The Cole attack on Oct. 12, 2000, had all the markings of al Qaeda: a walled-off safe house where the bomb was assembled, the sophistication of the "shaped charge" that took the technical aspect of the Cole assault up a notch from the group's alleged previous attack on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998.

And when authorities tracked down a newly issued boating license, they found a portrait of the suicide bomber, clean-shaven.

This stunningly picturesque, deeply Muslim nation of 18 million has nurtured a unique preoccupation with Islamic militants for nearly a generation. After the war in Afghanistan, Yemen absorbed not only its own veterans but also hundreds of foreign "Afghan Arabs" who streamed into a country that then required no entry visa.

In peace, however, the roving bands of righteous, heavily armed foreigners proved worrisome. Hundreds were asked -- then forced -- to leave.

"We can say that we deported almost all the non-Yemenis," said Abubakar Al Qirbi, Yemen's foreign minister. "There might be a few who remain. They are people who tried to integrate in traditional religious schools. Our security knows who they are. They are under surveillance."

As for the Yemeni veterans, the great majority settled back into normal life. Some, however, clung to the gun, setting up camps in the remote sections of a country that government officials are quick to acknowledge they control in name only.

Best known was the Islamic Army of Aden-Abyan, also called the Islamic Army of Aden. The group praised bin Laden, whose father was born in Yemen, and used a camp reportedly established by him in the southern village of Mudiyah. But the army was more clearly tied to Sheik Abu Hamza, a handless, one-eyed Afghan war veteran living in London's Finsbury Park.

For all that, analysts here say the group was not taken seriously until December 1998, when it kidnapped 16 Western tourists, four of whom were killed after government forces attacked. The Islamic Army of Aden-Abyan has not been heard from since.

The plot against the Cole was more deft, and years in the making. A U.S. official said the idea of ambushing a U.S. warship in port appears to date back to May 1998, when the USS Mount Vernon paid an official visit to Aden, staying two or three days.

Over the next 2 1/2 years, a team was assembled and put into action. "These were 'sleeper agents,' " said one Yemeni official. "They try to live a simple life in the area where they are."

Yemeni and U.S. officials described the operation in three phases: In the first, a senior al Qaeda official assessed the feasibility of the mission and made initial preparations. In the second, a technical specialist arrived to provide "the infrastructure," in this case, a boat, trailer, car and bomb.

"And the third phase was the action," the Yemeni official said. "They work simple. They work very, very simple."

In Aden, the main hitch would be the bomb. The previous January, a boat laden with TNT proved so heavy it sank as it made for the USS The Sullivans, also on a routine fueling stop. When the Cole steamed in 10 months later, it was the first-ever arrival in Aden of an Arleigh-Burke-class destroyer, the platform from which cruise missiles were launched at bin Laden's Afghan camps in retaliation for the embassy bombings.

In the aftermath, the legions of bewhiskered potential suspects were winnowed to the six whom Yemeni authorities say they are prepared to take to trial. Jamal al Badawi, an Afghan war veteran whom Yemeni officials say is Egyptian, was described as the chief local organizer.

But the apparent mastermind was not to be found.

Mohammed Omar Al Harazi, a Saudi man of Yemeni descent who is also known as Abdul Rehman Hussain Mohammed Al Safani, departed Yemen a few days before the Cole attack, officials said. He also left Nairobi before the East Africa bombings he helped plan, according to a U.S. official.

As an al Qaeda official linked to both the East Africa and Cole bombings, Safani presumably was the person meeting with Al-Midhar, the suspected hijacker of the plane that struck the Pentagon, when a surveillance camera captured his image in Malaysia earlier this year. Al-Midhar was later added to an Immigration and Naturalization "stop list," but by then had already entered the United States.

Cairo, Egypt

When al Qaeda was founded in Afghanistan in the late 1980s, Ayman Zawahiri was at the creation. The bespectacled Cairo physician would eventually help supply bin Laden's organization with its globalist ideology. Other Egyptians would supply the bodies, from field commanders such as former policeman Mohammed Atef to one of the suspected participants in the Sept. 11 attacks, Mohamed Atta.

In the beginning, Zawahiri and Atef formed a trio with the Saudi-born bin Laden, the labor neatly divided. Bin Laden brought financial resources, Atef provided a compelling ability to organize field operations, and to smuggle people and supplies around the region, and Zawahiri expanded the theological and philosophical base of their mission.

When the Afghan war ended, the men realized they had the makings of something sustainable. Following Zawahiri's ideas, they turned their eyes back toward Egypt, and across the globe to the United States.

The grandson of a sheik and a trained surgeon, Zawahiri was steeped from childhood in the modern Islamic politics that has coursed through Egypt since the formation of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1920s.

But in the 1970s he moved beyond the staid and nationalist political activism of the brotherhood to forge a broader theory of holy war. He saw it as a way to attack not only rulers perceived to be unjust, such as those in Egypt, but as justification to fight beyond national borders, anywhere that tyranny existed.

These principles of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad and the companion Islamic Group organization drew the disaffected such as Atef, brothers Mohammed and Khaled Islambouli, and others into a movement that penetrated not only the destitute slums of Cairo, but the ranks of the country's armed forces.

Though President Anwar Sadat had given Islamists political space, his decision to sign a peace treaty with Israel in 1979 put him squarely among the enemies. Two years later, Zawahiri and Islamic Group leaders such as Rifai Ahmed Taha used connections in the armed forces to arrange Sadat's assassination during a military parade.

Ataf and others fled the country, moving easily through Sudan, Somalia and ultimately to Afghanistan. Some, like Khaled Islambouli, were tried and executed. Zawahiri and Taha served prison terms for gun and other violations. Many would meet under bin Laden's hospitality later in Afghanistan.

It is believed now that Atef was the al Qaeda member who identified the first American "target of opportunity": a peacekeeping mission to Somalia. To al Qaeda, the mission was another U.S. incursion into an Islamic country, like the U.S. troops who remained in Saudi Arabia after the Persian Gulf War. Al Qaeda members claimed to have helped organize the attack that killed 18 U.S. soldiers in Somalia in 1992.

While allegedly supporting the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and the 1998 embassy bombings in East Africa, Zawahiri and Taha also began focusing on their native Egypt, and President Hosni Mubarak's increasingly close ties to the United States.

Fundamentalism had spread quickly under Mubarak. Radical preachers set up storefront mosques in rural villages and urban slums. Islamist professionals took control of prominent labor syndicates such as law and engineering, Atta's trade. Islamic investment groups offered high returns and ample charity through shaky pyramid schemes.

When the military expertise of returning Afghan fighters was linked with the increasingly popular radical sermons of Abdel Rahman -- later convicted as an organizer of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing -- and a flow of money and weapons from Zawahiri, Atef and others, the result was almost civil war.

Taha's Islamic Group had a popular base so wide that the entire Cairo neighborhood of Imbaba declared itself an independent Islamic state. Zawahiri's Egyptian Islamic Jihad went for higher-profile targets outside the country, nearly assassinating Mubarak in Ethiopia in 1995, and bombing Egypt's embassy in Pakistan.

Countered by an increasingly effective Egyptian police force -- more than 600 suspected terrorists and planners were executed or killed between 1992 and 1997 -- there has not been an acknowledged terrorist attack since the November 1997 murder of 58 foreign tourists in Luxor, a massacre that turned the population squarely against the militants.

Soon after the Luxor killings, leaders of the Islamic Group called a cease-fire, arguing that violence had failed to advance them toward the goal of making Egypt an Islamic state.

But in Afghanistan, Zawahiri wanted none of it. After more than a decade at bin Laden's side, he formally merged Egyptian Islamic Jihad with his al Qaeda to form a combined World Islamic Front for Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders. The name reflected the distance Zawahiri had traveled since the 1970s.

The group that once had formed around Sadat's murder was no longer satisfied with opposing the "iniquitous princes" in charge of the Arab world.

Now, they believed, they were after the power behind the throne.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (259840)5/31/2002 1:50:07 AM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 769667
 
Are we Finally Switching Sides with George W. Bush as Commander-in-Chief?
By Mary Mostert, Analyst, Banner of Liberty (http://www.bannerofliberty.com)

September 14, 2001

President George W. Bush tells us we are "at War" against terrorism. We've BEEN at war since the early 1990s - a war started in the Balkans, and a war in which Bill Clinton made America an ally of Osama bin Laden and the terrorists. On March 23, 1999, a day before Clinton began a 79-day bombing attack on the Serbs, talk show host Michael Reagan said:

"If you listen to my show a lot you'll remember that last week Col. David Hackworth said that many of the weapons being bought and paid for by the Kosovo Liberation Army are being bought and paid for by drugs,. Mary Mostert, my editor, who has developed sources in Europe, verified the drug connection. She sent me the Prague Post article reporting that one of the 'drug gangs' of the Kosovo Albanian 'Kosovo Liberation Army,' which supplies up to 90% of the illegal heroin in Scandinavia, had been arrested.

"It seems when there's drugs the President of the United States somehow always comes down on the side of the drug lords. Just as Hollywood always seems to come down on the side of Communists and uplifts them, the President always uplifts those who are dealing with drugs.

"He says there's a war on drugs? Maybe there is a war that is going to begin this week that's going to be paid for by drugs and we're going to be part of it."

It does. I've been writing about Osama bin Laden for years, especially his strange relationship with Bill Clinton. On August 24, 1998, I quoted from a report in December 1993,Independent News' , written by journalist Robert Fisk who met and interviewed Osama bin Laden in Almatig, Sudan. . He noted that during "the last great proxy battle of the Cold War was between the invading Russians and the Afghans." Bin Laden , son of a wealthy Saudi road contractor, went to Afghanistan to fight the Russians. He was dubbed "an Arab fighter" or a "freedom fighter." Much of his present headquarters, in fact, were reportedly financed by and helped built by our very own CIA through we he obtained training and even the US made stinger missiles with which he shot down Russian aircraft.

I wrote in the August 24, 1998 article ((http://www.bannerofliberty.com/OS8-98MQC/8-24-1998.1.html) that Fist believed the: "contribution to the mujahedin - and the indirect result of his training and assistance - may turn out to be a turning- point in the recent history of militant fundamentalism."
Within months Bin Laden was sending Arab fighters - Egyptians, Algerians, Lebanese, Kuwaitis, Turks and Tunisians - into Afghanistan; ''not hundreds but thousands,'' he said. He supported them with weapons and his own construction equipment. ..."We beat the Soviet Union. The Russians fled.'' Bin Laden claimed.

...A small number of mujahedin have gone to fight in Bosnia-Herzegovina but the Croats won't allow the mujahedin in through Croatia as the Pakistanis did with Afghanistan.''

That prompted me to look up a story I wrote on September 23, 1996 entitled "Clinton OK'ed Terrorist Financed Weapons to Bosnia Muslims Plus Free Weapons and 'Police Training' From US Taxpayers" in which I quoted a report to the Washington Post which said, "According to a senior Western Diplomat in the area, the Clinton administration knew of the activities of a so-called Relief Agency which was, in fact, funneling weapons and money into Bosnia to prop up the Izetebegovic Muslim government in Sarajevo In effect Clinton lifted the Arms Embargo SOLELY for shipments of arms and personnel from Iran to the Bosnian Muslims. The Administration's action was 'in large part because of the administration's sympathy for the Muslim government' the Post said, 'and the Third World Relief Agency and ambivalence about maintaining the arms embargo." We were told [by Washington] to watch them but not interfere,' the diplomat said.

I pointed out in that article:

"Throughout most of the Clinton Administration, beginning in 1993, Clinton not only knew of the arms smuggling scheme, he appears to have sanctioned it right up to the Dayton Peace Accord negotiations, in which he pretended a "neutral" role and promised additional weaponry free from America.

"Elfatih Hassanein organized the 'Third World Relief Agency' in 1987, evidently as a cover for his efforts to import Muslim fundamentalism into Yugoslavia. In a 1994 interview with Gazi Husrev Beg, a magazine focusing on Islamic affairs, Hassanein called for the creation of an Islamic state in Bosnia. 'Bosnia, at the end, must be Muslim Bosnia, otherwise, everything has lost its sense and this was for nothing.' When Bosnia broke away from Yugoslavia, the Muslims were not a majority in the province of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Hassanein and other Muslim fundamentalists worked to awaken a "religious sense among Bosnia's secular Muslims." In 1992 Muslims were the minority - Christians, either Catholic Croatians or Eastern Orthodox Serbs, were the majority in the Bosnia-Herzegovina. Muslim fundamentalism was not part of the scene in Bosnia until recently.

The Clinton Administration allowing the arming of the Muslims enabled them to drive out thousands of Serbs, insuring the election of Izetbegovic and a Muslim Bosnia. ...In September 1995, German investigators -- and agents from Austria's anti-terrorist task force -- raided the headquarters of Third World Relief Agency seizing enough documents to fill three minivans" according to the Post article. The records showed that over the years it had moved hundreds of millions of dollars through its account at First Austrian Bank. Bank officials noted that $80 million flowed into the agency's account in 1992; $231 million in 1993; and $39 million in 1994 and 1995. The chief of a Western intelligence agency estimated that more than half of the $350 million was used to buy weapons for the Bosnian Muslims, and to bribe Croatian officials to allow the weapons to cross their country. "Money was also smuggled into Sarajevo on flights of the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees; Bosnian government officials used the money to buy weapons from both Serb and Croat middlemen who operated inside Bosnia" one official said. Apparently in 1995 the Relief Agency was able to "wind down" its work, because of the "direct weapons pipeline between Iran and Bosnia that passed through Croatia starting in May 1995. With the approval of the Clinton administration in April 1995, that pipeline opened directly through the UN Arms Embargo when the Croatian government asked the United States if it opposed such a link. The Clinton Administration declined to respond, later defending the action by saying that "the US Congress wanted to lift the Arms Embargo." However, Congressional leaders knew none of this.

Evidently, it appears, the supplier of weapons to the Bosnia Muslims was none other than Osama Bin Laden. The result of arming the Muslims of Bosnia was the introduction into Europe of his brand of fundamentalism. Once before Bill Clinton basically sided with America's enemies in North Vietnam while other young men were risking their lives fighting North Vietnam. There is every reason to believe that Clinton, either through deliberate inaction in foreign affairs, or by looking the other way, enabled Bin Laden to build his army of terrorists.

Does this have anything to do with the killing of thousands of American in the terrorist bombing of the World Trade Center with one of our own jet-fuel laden airliners? It does. Guess who helped train the Kosovo Liberation Army, a group that had been a known terrorist organization for years by governments throughout the world, including the U.S. State Department? It does. Sadly, while American taxpayers were engrossed in Clinton's sex life, while the U.S. media was intent on convincing us that Clinton's lying and bizarre sex life was no big deal, billions of dollars were spent to prop up radical, even anti-American, terrorists and drug lords all over the world. It has had a particularly devastating effect in the Balkans.

You might remember, as you think and pray about the thousands of dead in those four American airplanes, in the World Trade Center and in the Pentagon, how the Serbs must have felt, and still feel, when we turned our backs on them. It was the Serbs, fighting the Nazis in their own country and all around them (the Croatians, Albanians) who literally saved Europe at the loss of more than 50% of their men and boys aged 17-50 during World War II. By their valiant battles, they delayed Hitler's invasion of Russia, causing the German Army to be bogged down in the bitter winter. They also saved the lives of more than 500 American pilots who were shot down over Yugoslavia in World War II.

And what was their reward? Bill Clinton, without any support from Congress or the UN, bombed them for 79 days on to enable the Kosovo Liberation Army, a terrorist drug dealing organization allied with Osama bin Laden to drive all Serbs, Macedonians, Montenegrins and Jews out of Kosovo - while it is occupied by NATO!

During the bombing of Yugoslavia, Jerry Seper of the Washington Times reported again the Osama bin Laden connection with the KLA. He wrote, on May 4, 1999:

"Some members of the Kosovo Liberation Army, which has financed its war effort through the sale of heroin, were trained in terrorist camps run by international fugitive Osama bin Laden -- who is wanted in the 1998 bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa that killed 224 persons, including 12 Americans.
The KLA members, embraced by the Clinton administration in NATO's 41-day bombing campaign to bring Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic to the bargaining table, were trained in secret camps in Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina and elsewhere, according to newly obtained intelligence reports. The reports also show that the KLA has enlisted Islamic terrorists -- members of the Mujahideen --as soldiers in its ongoing conflict against Serbia, and that many already have been smuggled into Kosovo to join the fight.

Known to its countrymen as the Ushtria Clirimatare e Kosoves, the KLA has as many as 30,000 members, a number reportedly on the rise as a result of NATO's continuing bombing campaign. The group's leadership, including Agim Ceku, a former Croatian army brigadier general, has rapidly become a political and military force in the Balkans. The intelligence reports document what is described as a "link" between bin Laden, the fugitive Saudi including a common staging area in Tropoje, Albania, a center for Islamic terrorists.

The reports said bin Laden's organization, known as al-Qaeda, has both trained and financially supported the KLA. Many border crossings into Kosovo by "foreign fighters" also have been documented and include veterans of the militant group Islamic Jihad from Bosnia, Chechnya and Afghanistan. Many of the crossings originated in neighboring Albania and, according to the reports, included parties of up to 50 men.

While Clinton staged token attacks on Osama Bin Laden's Afghanistan camp, knowing full well he wasn't in the camp, and on a pharmaceutical factory in the Sudan, he bombed our long-time Serb allies in Yugoslavia, who were fighting the kind of terrorism we have just experienced in New York and Washington, for 79 days, literally destroying the nation.

Now that the American public has been jolted awake by the slaughter at the World Trade Center, hopefully they will begin to identify the problems we really face in this nation. We have knowingly chosen during the Clinton years a leader we know was a liar and adulterer. Why did we believe him when he claimed the Serbs were committing genocide and had killed "100,000 Albanians?" We knew he was a liar. In the two years since the end of the bombing, forensic experts from many nations have reported the death of a few hundred Albanians at the hands of the Serbs - and some of those were known KLA terrorists.

I believe we have a very different kind of leader in George W. Bush. He has chosen a suburb group of people to assist him. Colin Powell, and others in his cabinet are some of the best people in America. Democrats in Congress are blocking others he nominated. He needs a full staff to begin to turn this great nation back to a moral course. Write your members of Congress and demand action now in active support of George W. Bush.

We are at war. And the war is complicated by the fact that we, like the Russians in World War II, started out on the wrong side. . The war did not start with this week's terrorism. It began, like World War I and World War II, in the Balkans when President Bill Clinton chose to use America's Air Force to help a terrorist drug cartel called the Kosovo Liberation Army take control of a large chunk of Europe.