To: Dayuhan who wrote (13691 ) 5/31/2002 10:27:38 AM From: TimF Respond to That's like saying that because a concert pianist has extensive musical training and unusual manual dexterity, the pianist is qualified to play the violin solo. Pilots are trained to fly airplanes, not to engage in armed combat at close range. The two are very different things. A member of a cabin crew that left the cabin during a hijacking would almost certainly be outnumbered. The number of hijackers, their armaments, and their positioning would be unknown. There would be a large number of hostages in a confined space. This is an extraordinarily difficult position for even a highly experienced and trained individual. Worst of all, leaving the cockpit would entail a breach of cockpit security and expose the cockpit to possible entry, the eventuality that must be avoided at all costs. I think it would be worth considering a system that would seal the cockpit completely for a fixed time, one that the cockpit crew could not override. If it were widely known that such systems were installed and that pilots were instructed to deploy them Obviously no system is perfect. I hesitate, though, to jump on the bandwagon that assumes personal armament to be the ideal solution to all problems involving violence. Certainly airline security is important and should not be neglected, but my gut feeling is that the next attack will use a completely different tactic.
