SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (81138)5/31/2002 12:58:30 AM
From: ElmerRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
18% ain't too bad when you add in about 1%-2% for X-box x86 chips. That pushes it to 20%.

What is this? The new math? It doesn't add 2% to AMD's share.

AMD shot any timely release of T-bred when they decided to use UMC. I guess they knew they had to throw in the towel.

Jimbo, we had the Chairman of the Board tell shareholders AMD has "World Class Yields". You are saying that this was a bold faced lie. How does this differ from Enron? This is what lawsuits are made from.

EP



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (81138)5/31/2002 11:28:44 AM
From: YousefRespond to of 275872
 
Jim,

Re: "18% ain't too bad when you add in about 1%-2% for X-box x86 chips. That
ushes it to 20%. Down from 22% when they had the MegaModelhertz lead."

Sorry Jim, your "math" just doesn't "add up". BTW, it should be easy
for AMD to regain the performance lead ... Just change their "ModelHurtz" sticker. <ggg>

Make It So,
Yousef


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News