Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dacoola who wrote (77320)	6/2/2002 3:01:31 AM
From: Edscharp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Well dacoola, Let me clarify. That post by Craig.goon, one of Anthony's goons, was a complete misrepresentation of my deleted post. The SEC did halt trading on the stock. But it was irrelevant to the intent of my post whether this was done by request or by the SEC's own willful intent. My post was not about that. It was about whether or not the SEC halt could've caught certain traders with significant short positions. You should be asking yourself why Craig-dot-goon would resort to name calling, expound on an irrelevant point and try to create additional uncertainty in EGBT unless he had his own ulterior motive. Incidentally, within a week after EGBT recommenced trading most of the bashers on RB pretty much faded away.