Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edscharp who wrote (77322)	6/2/2002 11:51:29 AM
From: semperfijarhead	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 122087

Actually, I think that if you claimed the company halted their own stock, it would be relevant to the posts that followed yours from Tony's group. A stock pumper might try to influence what is happening to a stock by claiming untrue facts . I am not saying you were doing that or that you are a stock pumper. I am saying that it happens and anyone might question whether a company really halted their own stock. Remember, RICO has a foundation on patterns of behaviour. It doesn't take too many incidents and Elgindy is probably well past the required number of incidents. However, what happened in each of these instances is relevant for so many different reasons. Perhaps Jeff will give you a copy of the post or reinstate ONE of the posts. I think it is relevant to the overall scheme of things to see what happened because of your post.