SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dante Sinferno who wrote (77334)6/2/2002 12:31:20 PM
From: Doug R  Respond to of 122087
 
Cube did attend one of my seminars. They were all set up as a means to create a group of TA minded traders who would remain in contact and be able to converse within a particular framework of chart reading. A common language as it were. As for the accusation of separating investors from their money it is well known that I put these seminars on at only very slightly above cost.
The point was for attendees to learn what I could teach them about TA. Cube was apparently incapable of learning.
The portfolio on my thread contains stocks that exhibit one of the chart formations I taught. It speaks for itself.
He can call me a fraud and a coward all he wants. His ability to assess character is obviously not one of his strong suits.



To: Dante Sinferno who wrote (77334)6/2/2002 1:13:06 PM
From: Cube  Respond to of 122087
 
Dante,

Yes I did attend one of DougR's seminars. It cost about $300 dollars and took about 6 hours. I was new to technical analysis and wanted to learn all I could. After the seminar I backtested all of DougR's theories and found that they did not work more than 50% of the time in the real world. No objective study of his work could come to any other conclusion. Problem is: it is hard to make money when half of your trades go against you. 50% accuracy is the same as throwing darts at the Wall Street Journal, or the chimpanzee that was picking stocks. The worst part was after the seminar. When you would find a trade using DougR's theories, and that trade turned out to be wrong, DougR would tell you that you didn't see the chart correctly, and that it really wasn't a correct reading of his 56 technical indicators. Sometimes it's an art form he would say. It was an art form alright, but it was a form that only DougR could read and only after the stock had made its move in one direction or the other.

I feel certain DougR knows that this is the case as well, but he continued on with these seminars. I have come to my own conclusion as to what this makes DougR. You will make your own.

Cube