SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (169723)6/2/2002 6:30:44 PM
From: Don Lloyd  Respond to of 436258
 
Pearly,

...I think I know the argument...The people with less will try and take from those with more....

It's more than that. Almost all issues that can be voted on directly affect very few people, but those people are affected intensely. But the decisions will be the result of 50.1% of voters making virtually completely uninformed decisions based on whim at best, or widespread lies at worst. There will always be a good chance of collecting majority support for such policies as hanging red-headed male citizens born in states starting with the letter M.

Regards, Don



To: maceng2 who wrote (169723)6/2/2002 7:00:20 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
I think I know the argument...The people with less will try and take from those with more

No! The argument is that true democracies end up looking rather fascist through tyranny of the majority. As one of the American founding fathers pointed out a major, major role of government is to protect the minority from the majority.

That is difficult, if not impossible, in a full-on democracy where the majority gets even a little riled-up.



To: maceng2 who wrote (169723)6/3/2002 1:40:10 AM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 436258
 
<Not sure I agree with you that a democracy is "inherently unstable".

Because of the clowns we elect????

DAK