SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CYBERKEN who wrote (260541)6/3/2002 6:23:32 AM
From: Arthur Radley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Cyberken,
I notice you railing against tax increases....so please explain why you support Bush. Considering here was a dope head drunkard who had failed at every job he had, plus skipped out on his military duty and then with borrowed money got involved with a group to buy a baseball team. Now why was a guy that had failed at every business endeavor he had been involved with asked to join this "elite" group of investors...again considering that he had no money to invest...Could it have been the fact he happened to be the President's silver mouthed son and this group needed some governmental favors....NAUGH! But in really that was what it was all about...and just what did this group need to make this investment work.....Well by GaDDD! They needed a tax increase for the citizens of TEXAS and Arlington, Texas to get richer....and Shrub became a millionaire.

Cyberken, why if tax increases are good for Bush and his crowd, why does he rail against them, like you do? Does the word hypocrite leave a bad taste in your mouth?



To: CYBERKEN who wrote (260541)6/3/2002 6:43:28 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Dear Cyberken: RIGHT ON MAN!! But, the MEDIA is involved in the COVERUP of the biggest treasons ever perpertrated against the USA. All for the Democratic party. Hope we survive this, but if we dont, then I am prepared, bet you are too. (wink wink) JDN



To: CYBERKEN who wrote (260541)6/3/2002 10:40:44 AM
From: MSI  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
I don't see it.

For example, why would your buddy Kristol call for investigations if these were a cover for "treason"?

You are confused, if you call an investigation into a coverup as a "coverup"