SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Tutt who wrote (49380)6/3/2002 5:55:41 PM
From: cfimx  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
dubya didn't force you to buy suncom all the way down, did he?



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (49380)6/3/2002 5:59:48 PM
From: Just_Observing  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Re: I think this is the worst market I've seen in 30 years of investing. Thanks, Dubya

I cannot agree more with you. The Nasdaq composite hit a high of about 5100 around March 10, 2000 (interday, the highest close was about 5050). Adjusting the highest close for inflation of 3.5%, we can normalize that close to 5450 in today's dollars. Today's close was 1562.56. That's a loss of 71.3% from the high in inflation adjusted terms.

Let's assume some one bought the average Nasdaq stock on March 10, 2000. Now if we get a 7% inflation-adjusted return (10 to 11% nominal) as is the historical average for stocks, it'll take 18.5 years to breakeven. Even if we get 20% inflation-adjusted return a year, it'll take 6.9 years to breakeven.



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (49380)6/3/2002 10:05:11 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Respond to of 64865
 
yes, maybe if he had pushed for a flat 13% income tax rate
like Putin did in Russia, we'd be doing a lot better here...

quote.yahoo.com^MTMS&d=c&t=2y&l=on&z=b&q=l