SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bigbuk who wrote (9947)6/4/2002 10:21:19 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Knight Trading Group Statement on Unfounded Assertions In Arbitration Claim
JERSEY CITY, N.J., Jun 4, 2002 /PRNewswire-FirstCall from COMTEX/ -- Knight Trading Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: NITE chart, msgs) today issued the following statement from Thomas M. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer and President, responding to allegations raised in today's Wall Street Journal concerning an arbitration claim filed last year by an ex-employee, Robert Stellato, against Knight Trading Group.

"Today's Wall Street Journal story is based on a private arbitration matter made public in what we believe may be an attempt by a plaintiff seeking personal gain. All of Mr. Stellato's allegations are unfounded and without merit. We are committed to taking whatever steps are necessary to protect investors, employees and the company. Knight is confident that, at the end of the arbitration process, the company will be fully vindicated.

"Mr. Stellato originally raised concerns about an institutional trading practice last year, and Knight's Compliance Department conducted an immediate review with Mr. Stellato and determined that the concerns were unfounded. The SEC and the NASD routinely inquire into claims brought to their attention. After the arbitration claim was filed, Knight made the plaintiff's statement of claim available to the SEC and the NASD on a proactive basis. Knight is cooperating fully with their informal inquiries.

"Knight is a reputable company with leading performance, compliance and regulatory standards. We take our responsibility to our clients seriously, and integrity is important to us. Knight provides excellent service to its institutional clients and is looking to expand its business. We have expanded our institutional business in the last year with important new hires and a targeted strategy. Regarding our broker-dealer business, we are disturbed that today's Wall Street Journal story discusses retail investor trading, while the allegations raised by the arbitration claim relate only to business with institutions. Regardless, Knight's trading practices are among the best in the industry, and we are very proud of our performance record."

Knight is the liquidity center that offers superior execution services to its broker-dealer and institutional clients in over-the-counter (OTC) and listed equity securities, and in equity options. In so doing, Knight helps its clients meet their fiduciary obligation of obtaining best execution for the securities orders that they route on behalf of their customers. Knight also maintains an asset management business for institutions and high net worth individuals through Deephaven Capital Management LLC.

Knight has the power to commit capital for market orders and also maintains one of the largest limit order books in the OTC market. The Company has approximately 1,180 employees worldwide and is one of the largest destinations for stock orders placed via the Internet. Knight traded 135 billion shares in the year 2001, a volume behind only those posted by Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). More information about Knight can be obtained at www.knight-sec.com or www.knighttradinggroup.com.

Certain statements contained herein constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the Company's industry, management's beliefs and certain assumptions made by management. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Since such statements involve risks and uncertainties, the actual results and performance of the Company may turn out to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Unless otherwise required by law, the Company also disclaims any obligation to update its view of any such risks or uncertainties or to announce publicly the result of any revisions to the forward-looking statements made herein; however, readers should carefully review reports or documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Source: Knight Trading Group, Inc.

Contact:

Margaret Wyrwas, Senior Vice President, Corporate
Communications & Investor Relations, +1-201-557-6954, mwyrwas@knight-sec.com,
or Kara Fitzsimmons, Manager, Corporate Communications, +1-201-356-1523,
kara_fitzsimmons@knight-sec.com, or Judy Pirro, Manager, Investor and
Shareholder Relations, +1-201-356-1548, judy_pirro@knight-sec.com, all for
Knight Trading Group, Inc.
URL: knighttradinggroup.com



To: bigbuk who wrote (9947)6/4/2002 10:24:55 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
WSJ: Knight Trading Faces Allegations That It Violated Rules

Tuesday June 4, 12:50 am Eastern Time

WSJ: Knight Trading Faces Allegations That It Violated Rules

The Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Association of Securities Dealers are investigating Knight Trading Group Inc. following allegations from a former senior executive that the company engaged in improper trading during the tech market's heyday, people familiar with the matter told The Wall Street Journal.

Though Knight isn't well known outside of Wall Street, the scope of the probes nevertheless could raise eyebrows among investors throughout the country. At one point during the market's peak two years ago, New Jersey -based Knight handled more than 11% of all the buy and sell orders for Nasdaq-listed stocks, meaning it was more than likely that individual orders for companies ranging from Microsoft Corp. (NasdaqNM: MSFT - News) to eBay Inc. (NasdaqNM: EBAY - News) eventually went through Knight.

The allegations play on some investors' fears about what happened during the Internet-stock craze -- that instead of looking out for investors' welfare, traders on Wall Street were instead protecting their own profits, even if their investor clients suffered.

The government inquiry stems from a sealed arbitration complaint filed late last year by Robert Stellato, the former head of Knight's institutional trading desk. In the complaint, filed with the NASD, Mr. Stellato alleges an elaborate system of trading-rule violations at the company that cost investors millions of dollars.

The alleged violations involve so-called front running, in which Knight traders are accused of placing their own orders for stock before placing the same orders for customers of the firm -- meaning Knight and its employees profited in advance from customer orders they knew would push the stock of a company up or down.

If proved true, Mr. Stellato's allegations go well beyond the findings of an earlier NASD investigation, which culminated in January in a $1.5 million fine against Knight for trading-rule violations.

The latest allegations against Knight also are apparently unrelated to a three-hour interruption of trading in Knight's own stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market Monday. Less than an hour before the markets' morning open, Nasdaq officials halted the trading of Knight shares in anticipation of company news. Knight later announced a glitch in its trading software had generated a large number of false sell orders in its own stock -- which drove down Knight's share price in premarket trading. Nasdaq intends to cancel the affected trades.

In a written response to the NASD, the company disputes Mr. Stellato's allegations, asserting there was no illegal trading at Knight. In fact, the company says Mr. Stellato drummed up the front-running stories in order to mask his own failings as a manager, which led ultimately to his termination. While Knight acknowledges it asked two senior traders whom Mr. Stellato accused of front-running to resign, the company claims those departures weren't the result of unlawful activity, but rather personality clashes between the traders and Mr. Stellato.

Neither Mr. Stellato nor his attorney would comment on his complaint, and the SEC and NASD declined to discuss the matter.

Wall Street Journal Staff Reporters Kate Kelly and Michael Schroeder contributed to this article.

biz.yahoo.com



To: bigbuk who wrote (9947)6/5/2002 5:05:06 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Perot Systems Gave Enron Pricing Tips, Senator Says (Update4)
By Ron Day

Plano, Texas, June 5 (Bloomberg) -- Perot Systems Corp., the computer-services company founded by H. Ross Perot, gave Enron Corp. the idea for schemes the energy trader used to manipulate California's power market, state Senator Joseph Dunn said.

``It appears that these were the brainchildren of Perot Systems,'' Dunn told a news conference in Sacramento, California. ``This is corporate behavior at its most despicable.'' Dunn, who is investigating energy-market manipulation, said he has given information about his claim to the state attorney general.

Perot shares fell 19 percent after the Los Angeles Times reported today that the company showed traders how to exploit loopholes to raise power prices after it helped to design the state's energy-exchange systems.

Dunn released a 1998 Perot Systems document that identifies flaws in the bidding systems of the California Power Exchange and the California Independent System Operator. The report contains a presentation to sellers in the state's power markets, including Reliant Energy Inc.

``It's a seminar on how market participants can game the ISO and the PX,'' Dunn said, using the abbreviations for the markets. The senator, of Santa Ana, California, spoke at hearing by his committee in Sacramento.

Shares of Plano, Texas-based Perot Systems, whose clients also include banks, health insurers and construction companies, fell $3.43 to $14.55. They dropped as low as $13 before trading was halted for about an hour. Volume of 8.91 million shares was the biggest since the company's initial public share sale in February 1999. The stock has fallen 29 percent this year.

Perot set up computer systems for the two energy markets and continued to give them technical support afterward.

Duty Cited

The company had the duty to alert regulators to the loopholes, not to sell the information to market participants, Dunn said. He accused Perot of a conflict of interest.

Chief Executive Officer Ross Perot Jr. said in an interview that he was unfamiliar with the issues Dunn raised. The company has mostly shut down the group that handled systems for energy trading in California, he said.

``We don't even know if the people who were involved are even around any more; we are digging into it,'' Perot said. ``My father talked to Senator Dunn this morning. He said this isn't how we operate.''

H. Ross Perot, the billionaire who ran for U.S. president in 1992 and 1996, told Dunn that he and the company would cooperate with the committee, the senator said.

Wrongdoing Denied

Perot Systems denied wrongdoing and in a statement said it didn't provide services to Reliant.

System defects identified in the 1998 document were fixed before the California Power Exchange became operational, the company said.

``Perot Systems actively alerted CalPX and California ISO to defects in the market rules, which had already been adopted by the state of California,'' the company said in the statement, distributed by PR Newswire. ``Perot Systems did not reveal or sell any confidential information of any kind.''

``Perot Systems discovered a `hole' in the (Independent Systems Operator's) protocols for buying, selling, and pricing, imbalance energy,'' the company's 1998 document said. Strategies described in the document are similar to tactics detailed in memos prepared by Enron, which filed the largest bankruptcy case in U.S. history last year.

``I have no idea whether they did any work for Enron,'' Enron spokeswoman Karen Denne said of Perot Systems. ``We're no longer in the trading business. The individuals in the trading business are no longer at the company. We are cooperating fully with all investigations.''

Enron Memos

Enron last month turned over internal memos to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission detailing how traders manipulated the California electricity market to raise prices. The memos discussed how to profit by creating and then relieving phantom congestion on the state's power lines. They also covered other techniques with names like ``Fat Boy'' and ``Get Shorty.''

The memos discuss how to profit by creating then relieving phantom congestion on California's power grid, a technique known as ``load shift.'' Using another technique, called ``ricochet,'' traders would move power in and out of California to avoid the state's price caps.

Another method, known as ``inc-ing load'' or ``Fat Boy,'' involved exaggerating demand for power a day ahead of time, and then getting paid by the ISO for excess power the trader had available.

Strategies in the Perot document are similar to ``Fat Boy'' and ``Load Shift.''

``A small participant could control prices in CA and destabilize the PX market,'' one section of the Perot Systems documents said. A ``relatively small PX participant could purposely congest a small interzonal path,'' another section said.

Yearlong Inquiry

Reliant gave the document to Dunn's committee as part of the panel's yearlong inquiry. The Independent System Operator and the Power Exchange were formed in 1998 to trade electricity under California's deregulated electricity markets.

Perot has been working with California's energy markets since at least 1997, and in March 2000 it agreed to sell services to the California Power Exchange.

California investigators and the FERC are trying to determine whether Enron and others illegally manipulated the western U.S. power market in 2001, when surging power prices drove the state's two biggest utilities to insolvency.

Power prices in California rose more than 10-fold on average in late 2000 and early 2001.

California Attorney General Bill Lockyer's office has received the Perot document from Dunn, spokeswoman Sandra Michioku said. The investigation is ongoing, she said, declining to comment further.

The state's two largest utilities, units of PG&E Corp. and Edison International, became insolvent after paying more for electricity than California law allowed them to charge customers. PG&E's Pacific Gas & Electric, the state's largest utility, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in April 2001.

The California Power Exchange didn't return calls seeking comment. The Pasadena, California-based exchange filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March 2001. ISO spokesman Gregg Fishman said Perot developed computer systems for the agency but wasn't involved in the design of its energy market.