To: pcstel who wrote (2113 ) 6/5/2002 6:21:22 PM From: Robert J. Irvin Respond to of 2737 Reality Check. "They should give away the stuff that cost them almost nothing, instead of Cash in the form of a subsidy." Cricket distributes its phones in Phoenix through 281 Circle K stores, in addition to other channels. I called 12 stores and got responses from the manager or assistant manager at seven of them, with two refusing to give out corporate info and three not available when I called. The results by store manager: Sales when phones not on sale; When phones on sale 1 to 2 per week; 2 to 3 per week 1 to 2 per week; 5 per week 3 to 4 per week; 3 to 4 per week* 10 to 15 per week; "a lot more" 10 per week; 20 per week** 10 per week; 20 per week** 10 to 12 per week; 30 plus per week *located by campus, perhaps why May sale didn't help **one manager of two stores, says among highest overall sales in system for all products The sale lasted two weeks, ending Memorial Day, offering a phone with an on-the-spot rebate for a walk-away price of $39.99. Several managers said the mail-in rebate didn't have much effect on sales, it's the walk-away price that counts. It was the first since a similar sale in late February and early March, also two weeks. What do I take away from this? In Phoenix at least, price sells phones! And management can and will hit its subscriber numbers by tweaking its promotions. Your suggestion, while appealing, would appear to drive sales over a cliff! Maybe other markets are different, for now I don't know. So, the cost of phones to Cricket becomes an even more critical variable. Any way to check whether these costs are coming down, and how low they may go? This could be the key to Leap's success or lack thereof, if it's true that price sells phones .