Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chadick who wrote (7714)	6/4/2002 10:20:48 PM
From: pbull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13815

Now THAT is scary. Still, a market like we had today is what I suspect, with blue chips going nowhere or down, and money beginning to trickle back into growth instead of value names. The fundamentals haven't turned yet, but a lot of these stocks should begin a modest recovery. No Roman candles, just the usual ebb and flow of funds. Only my opinion. PB

To: Chadick who wrote (7714)	6/4/2002 11:50:00 PM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13815

The prophet has spoken. <g> b

To: Chadick who wrote (7714)	6/7/2002 3:14:46 PM
From: pbull	Respond to of 13815

Biggs predicted a retest of the September lows in the Barron's Roundtable last January, said he didn't know why, just that the market would go back down and that he thought the lows would hold. Well, I saw where the S&P is back to where it was on Sept. 27. So, I'm willing to count that as a rare good call. "The market" is actually getting more stable, as the big value-oriented mutual funds support the blue chips that have been whacked (INTC among the latest). I don't think this is a bottom, but it's a bottoming process, unlike the panic lows of last September. All of the above is, of course, just a wild guess on my part. PB