Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (14183)	6/5/2002 1:21:57 PM
From: jttmab	Respond to of 21057

So any change of mind or doctrine can be retroactively explained by an assertion that Well, they thought it was authentic but it wasn't, we've now decided, so now what's infallible is this. If I understand correctly.I should think they'd have trouble selling that, but what do I know. This is scary...I wasn't sure at first, whether you were talking about the RC Church or the Bush Administration [see Message 17558441]. Had to check that. <s> Back to the Church, they don't much talk the low level details on infallibility in the Sunday sermons. Just do what the Pope and Bishops tell you and drop a check in the basket. See you in heaven. In defense of the Church, they are pretty consistent and they do limit what is exactly infallible doctrine. The phrasing does allow them the 'out' of when you have a heretic like Luther [no offense to Lutherans] the Pope can claim that he wasn't speaking infallibly with his heresy. jttmab