SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: slacker711 who wrote (31603)6/5/2002 7:45:01 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
Will he be willing to negotiate in good faith and make the sacrifices that would be necessary for peace?

Sharon's not a liar, unlike Arafat, and I think even in the Likud the dream of Greater Israel has died. But he's not prepared to offer squat to Yasser Arafat -- why should he? Arafat wants Palestine instead of Israel, not next to Israel, and every deal Arafat signs is worthless before the ink dries. Do you think that rewarding Arafat's behavior of the last two years will improve Israeli security?



To: slacker711 who wrote (31603)6/6/2002 9:20:46 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Obviously, Arafat's credability is nill....but the question for Bush is how much can he trust Sharon? Will he be willing to negotiate in good faith and make the sacrifices that would be necessary for peace?

Of course, the nice part about the Sharon side of the equation is that the Israeli middle would throw him out of office if they thought he was bypassing a chance for peace.


Right. Plus, the US has the economic means to exert considerable pressure on Sharon. That kind of leverage does not exist over Arafat.

Reading the newspaper today was interesting. Bush, through Fleischer, is starkly said to view Arafat as being lacking in credibility. I don't recall the exact language but it seemed to be unusually harsh, even for a plain-spoken President.