Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (14244)	6/5/2002 10:01:19 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 21057

Too bad you're getting tired. I don't debate scientific particulars with anyone. I already knew what you so thoughtfully pointed out--that I am not qualified to do that. I do try to avoid making arguments on subjects that I am not qualified to discuss. Sorry to disappoint you. My only purpose is to do what I can to mitigate the ridiculous polarity on this issue. Insisting that human activity doesn't affect climate is ridiculous. So the fact that one of the authors of the report says it didn't say what the popular press reported it to say doesn't impress you? I believe I mentioned in an earlier post that I was waiting to see the report for myself. Although I haven't seen it for myself, though, I don't doubt that the report affirmed some human impact on climate, as reported. Did you know EPA took the report down from their site? The cover page and TOC are still there, but not the report.