Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: charred who wrote (4410)	6/6/2002 10:51:43 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4504

Maybe...So is the river on the MAP BONE DRY? Seasonal, deep enough, or wide enough to be graded lower and deeper, and hense run off EL Nino? Have you even tought about a 25% each land position phased in mining on the surface golds? Is the labor market taking a siesta? WAS that VOTE IN PUBLIC view of hand raisings by the LANDLORDS who might make a mental list or was it a secret ballot? The plot THICKENS. El Nino doesn't cut it for me. Chucka small plots also can be productive, say INTENSIVE GARDENS. MAP PLOT. PLOT THE VOTES again ...a culvert and catch basin would STOP any run off water diaster, could is a two way word. DISCLOE ur vested interest please? I have non but shares I bot w my own money.

To: charred who wrote (4410)	6/6/2002 6:05:14 PM
From: Albert V	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4504

Charred- I am not immune to the desire to keep a pretty area pristine. But if the other potential deposits in the area work out, either by MAnhattan or someone else, which are NOT under the town, but in isolated areas, then there are going to be mines and smelters in the area anyways....... dont you think?? A great mining district will get mined, someday. And if those other deposits are mined, even with the envronmental effects that you say, then there is little to left to the arguement to not building one additional mine at the town.... just the hassle of shifting people to better housing. So if this area has the potential that Claude and others have said in the past, face it, there will be mines.... whether this deposit is the first to be developed or the last (prob more likely now) it looks like it will happen sooner or later anyways. Philosophically, is it right to say there is no right to build mines there, so the world's industry, which we all use, including the people of Tambo grande, gets its resources from Sudbury or some other pretty place instead??? Al PS perhaps you're right about the company pulling the wool over the investors eyes. But we all knew the risks and the previous violence was known too....