SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : NOTES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Didi who wrote (1869)6/6/2002 2:35:03 PM
From: Didi  Respond to of 2505
 
S&P's Ken Shea, Investment Policy Committee...

"S&P: Lighten Up on Stocks", 6/6/02:
businessweek.com

"What to Hold in Risky Times"
businessweek.com

===============================

Rearranged.

>>>JUNE 6, 2002

MARKET VIEWS • From S&P

S&P: Lighten Up on Stocks

Its Investment Policy Committee says investors should trim the equity portion of their portfolios -- and boost cash holdings.

With a laundry list of negatives weighing on the stock market, Standard & Poor's Investment Policy Committee -- a group of senior managers who meet weekly to oversee all investment-related activity done in S&P's name -- has decided to change its asset-allocation recommendation for investors.

The committee voted on June 5
... to reduce the recommended equity exposure by five percentage points, to 55%, and
... raise the cash allocation to 25% from 20%.
... The recommended bond exposure remains at 20%.
... This follows a similar move by the committee in April, 2002.

The committee believes that the market will be pressured lower by:
... concerns over global tensions,
... potential domestic terrorism,
... the weakening U.S. dollar,
... slowing economic growth,
... executive indictments, and
... an historically unfavorable seasonal period for stocks.

In addition, equity valuations remain unjustifiably high.

In the 1990s, lofty stock prices were justified by:
... the benefits of the peace dividend,
... accelerating earnings growth rates,
... a U.S. budget surplus, and
... declining long-term interest rates.
But today the reverse is true.

Enronitis has evolved into Tycosis, an infectious condition that spreads pessimism among investors.

And until conditions improve, S&P believes it's a good idea for investors to cut back on the stock portion of their portfolios. <<<

--------------------------

Rearranged some.

>>>JUNE 6, 2002

INVESTING Q&A

What to Hold in Risky Times

Amid the many threats looming over the market, S&P's Kenneth Shea says investors can still find long-term buys.

"Investors are still waiting for concrete signs" that earnings are on the way back up and that several other uncertainties are cleared away before they push the stock market robustly higher, says Kenneth Shea, vice-president and director at Standard & Poor's Equity Research & Services.

The process will take time, according to Shea, but he has hope that confidence in accounting and corporate governance can be restored with the help of a more vigilant Securities & Exchange Commission but without massive new government intervention.

For now, he reports, S&P still thinks that buying and holding select stocks for the long term is a sound strategy.
He cites such choices as
... PepsiCo (PEP ),
... Gannett (GCI ),
... Sysco (SYY ),
... St. Jude Medical (STJ ), and Wilmington Trust (WL ).

Other S&P buy recommendations include
... Exxon Mobil,
... Citigroup, and
... Qualcomm.

These were among the comments Shea made in a chat presented on June 4 by BusinessWeek Online and Standard & Poor's on America Online, in response to questions from the audience and from BW Online's Jack Dierdorff. Following are edited excerpts from the chat. A full transcript is available from BW Online on AOL at keyword: BW Talk.

Q: I'm getting tired of asking this question, but I'm also getting tired of this market. When do you think it will recover from these sinking spells and get really going again?
A: I believe that investors are still waiting for concrete signs that corporate earnings are on the mend and that the plethora of uncertainties hanging over the market shows some signs of dissipating. From a technical point of view, the break below 1049 on the S&P 500 suggests a test of the September, 2001, lows of about 9700, according to Mark Arbeter, S&P's chief technical analyst. From a fundamental point of view, the market also seems to be fairly valued at a rich 20 times 2002 earnings estimate of $51 for the S&P 500. So it seems the market is likely to be range-bound in the near term.

Q: Do you think the background public nervousness over terrorism is perhaps exacerbating every bit of bad news?
A: I believe that the terrorism threat that's overhanging the market is but one risk factor investors are digesting now. Other material risk factors include skepticism over accounting practices and a crisis of confidence in corporate governance and the overall integrity of the markets. Until these issues become resolved in investors' minds, they'll continue to weigh on already rich valuations.

Q: What will it take to resolve those doubts? New questions on accounting and corporate governance seem to be in the news almost every day.
A: As a result of more intense scrutiny over corporate accounting practices and overall corporate governance by investors and regulators, my hope is that this process will ultimately cause a fundamental change in the way these practices are conducted in the future. I believe that positive strides can be made in these important areas without the need for significant new government oversight. In the long haul, this cleaning-out process, which includes a more vigilant SEC, will be healthy for the equity markets. But this process will take time.

Q: What will it take to restore faith in analysts' research? Can the analyst community ever be trusted again?
A: The current scrutiny over Wall Street research practices is already bringing about changes in the way many research firms conduct their business. As a result, it has also provided a good window of opportunity for providers of independent research -- which don't face the conflicts of interest of those research firms that share a roof with investment bankers. At S&P, we have been providing unbiased equity research and opinions for many years.

Q: Would you buy GE (GE ) now for the short and long term?
A: S&P analyst Robert Friedman recommends investors hold the shares of GE. He believes they're fully valued from both an intrinsic point of view, as well as relative to its peers on a p-e basis.

Q: Ken, what's your take on ORCL (Oracle)?
A: S&P analyst Jon Rudy recommends that investors with long-term time horizons accumulate the shares of the world's largest supplier of information-management software. The company should benefit from its commitment to increasing investments in research and development, and its strategy of selling an integrated suite of applications to compete with "best of breed" vendors to pay off over the long term.

Q: Temp firm Robert Half International (RHI ) -- can it recover its glory days?
A: S&P currently recommends investors accumulate the shares of the world's largest specialized provider of temporary and permanent personnel in the fields of accounting and finance. The company should benefit from an eventual improvement in job-market conditions and enjoys a highly profitable and cash-generative operation, while carrying very little long-term debt. The shares are a good long-term holding.

Q: Why is Pfizer (PFE ) having such a rocky road lately?
A: The world's largest prescription-pharmaceuticals company has actually held up better than the shares of most of its closest peers. From a broad view, the major U.S. pharmaceutical industry is being challenged by slowing growth rates amid heightened competition in key therapeutic categories, longer Food & Drug Administration product-review times, and a flood of generic drugs on the market.

In addition, the new-product pipelines appear anemic, with few clear blockbusters on the near-term horizon. Although Pfizer should benefit by virtue of a relatively robust new-drug pipeline relative to its peers, growth prospects still remain less than spectacular, at about 15% over the next few years. The shares already incorporate much of this good news and may see only modest market outperformance over the near term.

Q: Think Qualcomm (QCOM ) will ever make any money?
A: S&P analyst Ari Bensinger recommends investors buy the shares of this maker of wireless telecom products and services, based on its proprietary code division multiple access, or CDMA, technology. The company boasts a very attractive financial model, with high net-profit margins, no long-term debt, and over $2.5 billion in cash. Future growth prospects look robust. And S&P believes Qualcomm can generate earnings growth in excess of 25% annually over the next few years. The shares are attractive here for long-term investors.

Q: How do you feel about companies using pro forma accounting?
A: In response to a great deal of frustration by investors regarding the confusing use of so-called pro forma earnings in recent years, S&P announced that it would be incorporating a new measure of earnings reports to help investors better understand the level of earnings that are actually reported by companies.

Dubbed "core earnings," this S&P system will better measure the true earnings power of a company's business by excluding certain nonoperating gains, while including some legitimate expenses that are currently overlooked by some companies. By establishing a better standard with its core earnings framework, S&P believes it will enhance an investor's ability to compare earnings results for a given company and across industries.

Q: Do you see S&P's core-earnings concept being widely picked up?
A: Yes, I do believe that investors are hungry for such a methodology to emerge, particularly from an independent provider of financial data and analysis like S&P. It should be noted that S&P continues to solicit input from regulatory bodies, as well as the investment community, in polishing and refining this methodology.

Q: How much longer do you expect small caps to outperform large caps?
A: Over the past five years, the returns for the S&P MidCap 400 index and the S&P 600 SmallCap index have outperformed the returns of the S&P 500 index. Although this trend continues into this year to date, S&P believes that the cycle may be nearing an end soon. The valuation gaps between the smaller-cap indexes and the S&P 500 have narrowed considerably over the last few years -- to the point that the large-cap stocks as represented by the S&P 500 may begin to track the performance of the small caps by the end of this year.

Q: What's in the future for XOM (Exxon Mobil)?
A: S&P energy analyst Tina Vital recommends investors buy the shares of the world's largest publicly owned integrated oil company. In light of its strong presence in oil exploration as well as refining, it offers a strong balance for those investors who wish to avoid trying to time the oil price cycles. The company generates very sizable levels of free cash flow, with very little long-term debt, and is very well positioned for further growth. Its current moderate valuation level and 2%-plus dividend yield offer compelling total return investment prospects.

Q: What's your opinion on Citigroup (C )?
A: S&P analyst Stephen Biggar recently upgraded the shares of this major diversified financial services company to a strong buy, due to its attractive valuation and strong position in the most attractive areas within the financial-services industry. The company is a good long-term holding for the unmatched diversity of its revenue stream, both by product set and geography.

Q: Is the strategy of buying and holding for the long term still valid today?
A: Yes, I do believe that the strategy of buying and holding is a smart strategy for investors in building wealth. I would recommend that investors do their homework to search for those companies that have demonstrated an ability to generate steady increases in earnings with rising levels of free cash flow and profitability. Such companies for the long haul include PepsiCo (PEP ), Gannett (GCI ), Sysco (SYY ), St. Jude Medical (STJ ), and Wilmington Trust (WL ).

Q: Three beaten-down names here -- Lucent (LU ), AT&T (T ), WCOM (WorldCom). Which has the best chance of some upside?
A: Of the three companies mentioned, the best positioned, according to S&P, are AT&T and Lucent, although both are ranked as market performers over the next 6 to 12 months. S&P continues to recommend that investors avoid the shares of WCOM, however, considering its difficult financial situation and sluggish long-distance market conditions.

Q: Interest rates -- what's the scenario for the rest of the year?
A: S&P chief economist David Wyss projects modestly rising interest rates through the rest of the year and into the next, reflecting a gradually strengthening economy as well as the possible increase in inflation expectations that go along with that.

Q: Is there any hope for Tyco International (TYC )? I know S&P recommended it for quite a while, though no more.
A: S&P continues to recommend a hold on Tyco. This follows the latest development of Chairman and CEO L. Dennis Kozlowski leaving the company to attend to some personal tax issues. S&P maintains its opinion that the shares offer somewhat attractive upside potential, based on its analysis that Tyco's assets may be undervalued at the current depressed share levels. It still believes that liquidity remains intact to meet near-term debt maturities.

Edited by Jack Dierdorff<<<



To: Didi who wrote (1869)7/3/2002 12:59:32 PM
From: Didi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2505
 
Rerun--Prof. Siegel: "real returns could average 5-7% for the next 5 or perhaps 10 years"

knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu

============================

>>> Recovery? Yes.
Robust? No.


In the 10 days after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the stock market plunged nearly 12%. Then it turned around, racking up a stunning 19% gain by the end of the year.



Market experts have long held that stocks anticipate economic events by about six months. According to this view, the autumn and early winter gains reflected investors’ belief that the economy would pull out of the recession in the spring of 2002.



While there is some debate over whether the economy was truly in a recession last year – gross domestic product definitely fell for one quarter but perhaps not for two – a recovery is clearly under way now. For the quarter ended March 31, GDP surged at a blistering 5.8% annual pace, the fastest rate since late 1999. GDP had grown at a sluggish 1.7% rate in the fourth quarter of 2001. The economy shrank in the second quarter of 2001, and perhaps in the third quarter as well.



But stocks, rather than continuing last year’s rise, have turned downward again. The Standard & Poor’s 500 is off approximately 8.5% this year, having given up about half the gains enjoyed at the end of 2001. Stocks fell even after the first quarter’s strong GDP figures were reported late in April.



What, then, is the market saying about the next six months? And what does the economic data suggest? “I think we’ve got a good setting now for recovery,” said Lawrence Klein, emeritus professor of economics and finance at Wharton and the University of Pennsylvania, and winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1980. But, he adds, some of the elements of a robust recovery have yet to fall into place. Growth for the rest of year will probably be slow. “We’re still lacking a follow-through in business spending and investment.”



Having built up spending and investment in the late 1990s, only to be burned by the downturn of the past two years, businesses are especially cautious about pumping up investment again, he said. Consumers appear to have overcome post-9/11 concerns, he added, but businesses still harbor fears about the potential economic effects of war or another terrorist attack. “For the businessman who has to plan risky investments for the next 10 years, [those fears] haven’t worn off.”



According to Klein, a number of factors kept last year’s economic downturn mild, making recovery easier. In the latter part of 2001, production declined as business drew down inventories, but consumer spending was healthy. Auto sales, for example, jumped to around 20 million units in October, compared to 16 or 17 million in a typical month, as dealers offered zero percent financing. Those deals helped soften the recession.



In addition, he said, last year’s federal tax rebates kicked in just as the economy needed stimulation after the terrorist attacks. “The rebates were quite powerful.” And in the months since 9/11, government spending on the military has also stimulated the economy. “We have now what I call military Keynesianism,” Klein said. “Like it or not, that’s going to be a strong point for the economy. It played a significant role in the [GNP] figures that were reported for the first quarter of 2002.”



Another key to the economy is the residential housing market, where sales held up because of low mortgage rates, Klein pointed out. Furthermore, with many inventories dramatically reduced by the end of last year and consumers still demanding products, companies boosted production early in this year, accounting for the dramatic GDP figure reported last month, he said.



Then on May 7, the Labor Department reported that productivity rose at a stunning 8.6% annual rate in the first quarter, the most dramatic figure since 1983. Productivity rose because output increased while employment and wages did not. In fact, unemployment has inched up to 6%, from 5.7% early in the year. With inflation and interest rates at historically low levels, “I think we’ve got a good setting now for recovery,” Klein predicted.



Productivity gains mean companies can improve profits without raising prices, which would trigger inflation. Citing the lack of inflation threats, the Federal Reserve announced May 7 that it would continue its low-interest rate policy. Most analysts don’t expect a rate hike before August.



Despite some good economic news, Klein said he doubts that the first quarter’s economic growth will be repeated, given the shortage of business spending. For the current quarter and the next two, he expects GDP to grow at an annualized rate of 2 to 3%. The Fed, too, warned it is “still uncertain” that consumer demand will continue to strengthen.”



Consumer spending grew at an annual rate of 3.5% in the first quarter. While that was a good sign, many economists focused on the fact that spending had grown by 6.1% in the prior quarter. Any sign of a fall off is worrisome.



Wharton finance professor Jeremy Siegel agrees that GDP is not likely to grow at the first quarter’s torrid pace for the rest of the year. Once the depleted inventories are restored, there will be less need to ramp up production. “No one expects it to,” he said. “I think we’re probably going to settle at 3 to 3 ½% growth in this quarter, and I think it’s very possible to reach 4% in the last two quarters of the year.



Consumer demand, he added, is not growing fast enough to stimulate anything more than modest gains in the stock market. “The truth of the matter is that we’re basically seeing that demand is growing in the middle single-digits numbers. The market is expecting earnings growth of 8, 10, 12%, and it’s very hard to generate that off of single-digit [sales] volume growth.



“I think the stock market might have more trouble than the economy, because profits are going to be hard to come by,” Siegel noted, adding that investors remain skittish and have thus not jumped back into stocks with great enthusiasm, despite the improving economy. All the major market indexes are well below their highs of two years ago. The record highs of early 2000 were caused by the bubble in tech stocks. Despite the losses of the past two years, stocks are not cheap today by historical standards.



At around 1050, the Standard & Poor’s 500 is trading at about 20 times analysts’ projected earnings for the next 12 months, according to Siegel. “I think that right now that’s a fair market valuation. It’s not real cheap, but not at all overpriced or too expensive …That doesn’t mean we can’t get more undervalued if investors get discouraged at the pace of growth of corporate profits.” The stock market is quite fragile and could fall considerably with a shock like another terrorist attack, he said.



The stock market, Siegel added, “is really a wild card.” If stocks were to fall dramatically, consumer spending could shrink, pulling one of the legs out from under the economic recovery.



Stocks, he predicted, are likely to offer nominal (before inflation) returns of 7 to 9% a year, far less than they did in the 1990s, but still much better than the returns offered by bonds and cash. After factoring in inflation, he added, real returns could average 5 to 7% for the next five or perhaps 10 years.<<<