SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (170817)6/6/2002 4:47:51 PM
From: sandeep  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Did you even read what he posted? He could have kept the straddle and made a bundle. The traders who tell you that they wish they had taken one side of the trade don't tell you that when they do, they lose on that one too...

One does a straddle because one doesn't know the direction - in such cases, one can't take one side of that trade.



To: GraceZ who wrote (170817)6/6/2002 4:48:40 PM
From: KeepItSimple  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
I am just trying to NOT think about how I could have bought a brand new ferrari testarosa with the profits I *would* have made in the last 30 minutes, if only I hadn't hedged my puts with a straddle.

:( :(

----------------------
Sorry, dude. Its one of the reasons I don't hedge because if you are really right the hedge will screw you. I can't tell you how many times a trader has told me how they wished they'd only taken on one side of a trade.



To: GraceZ who wrote (170817)6/6/2002 4:52:34 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
there's a right and a wrong way to hedge -- to always buy straddles isn't it -- they make sense when vols are near all-time lows.

Hedging when something has run considerably in your favor when it only costs you a small fraction of potential profits makes good sense -- to prevent losses.

The general statement: Hedging is bad == nonsense.